User138562
I think no contact can be hurtful and underserved. It can be unfair.
If the "no contact" is used as leverage to get something (think silent treatment), that could be abusive. I also wouldn't consider that no contact.
True no contact, ending the relationship completely, is not abusive. No adult is required to have a relationship with someone if they don't want to. Familial relation doesn't change someone right to choose who is in their life.
You could stop talking to your cousin because they don't like cilantro and that would be your right and absolutely not an abusive action. Even though it's unfair and hurtful.
It sucks to have to live with the consequences of their decision but that doesn't make their actions abusive.
Repeatedly violating their no contact wishes would be though.
I couldn’t word this better. Estrangement can be painful and hurtful but no it’s not abusive. You aren’t owed a relationship with someone because of a blood relationship , or any other reason. Adults are allowed to decide for themselves, and parents for their children whom they wish to have a relationship with. Things can be hurtful to someone and not abusive. However continuing to push back on and break down someone. Who has gone to no contact , could be abusive. And it could definitely land on in trouble with the law. My husband and myself, and our children were nc with my hateful in-laws for decades. It was by far the best choice we ever made.