"The international research group followed 954 people from the same town in New Zealand who were all born in 1972-73. ( www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33409604 ) The scientists looked at 18 different ageing-related traits when the group turned 26, 32 and 38 years old.
The analysis showed that at the age of 38, the people's biological ages ranged from the late-20s to those who were nearly 60."
"Prof Moffitt told the BBC: "Any area of life where we currently use chronological age is faulty, if we knew more about biological age we could be more fair and egalitarian."
So we keep telling them, but employers don't seem to listen, neither do journalists and fashion students.
I think it was the sheer size of the men, rather than the women, that made me feel so small, Ana. They're huge! DH is a bit of a short***e - I'm used to someone bumbling along beside me at the same level, allowing for the heels!
I was surprised to learn from my googling that the average height of a US woman is acually shorter by half an inch than that of an average UK woman! Who'd have thunk it?
(5.3 and a half" and 5'4" respectively, apparently)
We need somebody to provide a link to check the science of short people living longer ( No, please! Only joking.) anyway, science or not, I like the sound of it.
I'm only 4'10" (in heels!) and am the only shorta**e in the family, so I was worried about my two DSs taking after me. Funnily enough I wouldn't have worried if they had been girls as it was never a problem for me being short. I needn't have worried though, as they are both average height. Thank goodness for DH's family's tall genes!
nothing wrong with being short - excepting extreme shortness being of Celtic stock (Cornish/Welsh) I am the same height as my mother and grandmother and not unusual for the post-war generation. horrified at the suggestion of growth hormones for being 'short'
I know what S2B is talking about. My DS didn't grow at all between 10 - 14, so we were worried. We got an appontment with the consultant (himself only about 5'4") and he ordered a wrist bone x-Ray which showed DS had a bone age of 10. This was good, he explained as he would still grow to normal height. Had the bone age been 14 it would have meant he had the same bone age as chronological age and therefore would not grow very tall.
Sure enough within 6 months he had a growth spurt and is now a good average height.
Not relevant but I think interesting. The Royal Ballet School did bone age tests on a boy of 16 who had tall parents and decided he would not grow to be tall enough to be a professional ballet dancer. He went to another school, grew to over 6 ft and did follow his dream!