Blondiescot
I'm not exactly sure what you would find to be an acceptable compromise in this situation, Lathyrus. You seem to be implying that the OP should put her husband first, no matter what. I'm not sure where 'compromise' enters into that.
No, I don’t think I’ve ever said that. In fact I’ve said a couple of times that she should go ahead and do the day a week and that I would if it was me.
It’s the OP who says she will “chose@ between him and her grandchild if he continues to be “unhappy” about her choice.
Not if he stops her. He can’t do that. Just if he’s unhappy with the changes she’s decided to make in their relationship. He had no say in what she proposed. Most people wouldn’t be happy if their partner just presented them with a change that affected them both.
Compromise is both people presenting what they want and then negotiating with both parties conceding something and both parties gaining something of what they want.
Not one person saying what they want and what they’re prepared to do as an alternative. End of.
I’m really taken aback at the vehement responses and accusations thrown at a man who has, by the OPs own posts, only said that he is not happy with the arrangements proposed and the impact they will have.
How is it abusive, bullying, etc etc for him to state how it will all affect him? Is he not allowed to have feelings and to point out the consequences of her unilateral decision?