Anya There has been an explosion of interest in the effects of gluten on our bodies. The evidence that people with Coeliac Disease must eliminate all gluten from their diet is overwhelming.
However, the evidence to support eliminating gluten as beneficial for those of us who do not have Coeliacs, is sketchy to say the least. You can surf the internet and come up with "evidence" to prove anything. Individuals can also report their own anecdotal experiences, but actual concrete evidence that gluten is bad for us, if we do not have Coeliacs is difficult to find.
Many people seem determined to believe that a gluten free diet is somehow a healthy option, but for the vast majority of us that isn't true.
"A whopping 21 percent of Americans are currently making an active attempt to eat gluten-free, according to a Gallup poll published July 23. That percentage dwarfs the 1 percent of the U.S. population diagnosed with celiac disease — the only medical condition that requires gluten-free products for someone with the disease to live a healthy life.
More and more Americans are on the anti-wheat warpath trend, as the label "gluten free" appears on everything from craft beer to cat food. For those with celiac disease, a life-threatening autoimmune disorder that destroys the gastrointestinal tract, going gluten-free is critical to avoid damage to the small intestine. For everyone else, though, it is an unnecessary, and potentially unhealthy, diet."
Admittedly this is an American study, but a quick trawl threw this article up. I guess the arguments will continue about gluten, yet at present, as I said, the evidence is weak that gluten is bad for you unless you have Coeliacs.