I had high (bad) colesterol and was given a choice to take statins or try diet. I suggested statins for a few months to clear the blood then I would try to keep it low by diet, but she seemed to misunderstand me and left it at diet only. So it was grapefruits before dinner, Benecol, oat bran etc and although I still used butter and ate hard cheese and a little chocolate, amazingly it worked. But this time I saw a different nurse and she said that although my colesterol is now good I would still benefit from statins as I am over 72, I took them for a week but was shocked to discover that you should avoid bran or grapefruit amongst other things. After a week I had an appointment with the nurse to see if I was doing OK on the pills, and I told her that I had already been suffering from 90% of the side effects before taking them, plus I could not understand the logic of replacing natural foods that had helped me lower my colestetol, with a chemical substitute. So now I am not taking them and instead my colesterol will be monitored twice a year. I am not really sure if it was the right decision as there is a history of heart attack and stroke in my family. As I told the nurse, it is not easy when even the medical professionals give opposite signals.