I don’t really understand the nostalgia for old “characterful”houses. They look attractive, but unless have undergone major renovation work, in which case they are no longer original anyway, they are unsuitable for modern lifestyles.
The idea that older homes are not suitable for modern lifestyles is often said on the George Clarke programmes, but I don't know what it means. What 'lifestyles' are they talking about?
My house is Edwardian, but the style is typical of Victorian houses and has the same layout as the 1930s one we lived in before buying this one. It's a very common layout in British homes. You open the front door into a vestibule, which leads to a hall, off which is a large sitting room at the front, a smaller dining room (which doubles as a second sitting room) behind, and a kitchen at the end of the hallway, beyond which is a boot room with a downstairs loo and broom cupboard at the back. Upstairs are 4 bedrooms, a bathroom and a separate loo.
What 'lifestyle' would that not accommodate? We brought up two children here, and the layout works now that there are just the two of us. We could eat in the kitchen but choose not to, as I don't like sitting on top of pots and pans, so we use the dining room, which will comfortably seat 8 (10 at a push) then collapse the table afterwards to create more room in there so we can use it as an alternative room for reading, watching TV or listening to music.
As I said upthread, next door is one giant room - even the hall is incorporated into the space. They have 'zoned' it, which basically recreates the original layout using furniture - sofas around the TV, a dining table and chairs at the back, and the ubiquitous kitchen island with more chairs around it. If you want to have a barn dance or have a lot of parties for the whole family, there is definitely space to do it, but there is no privacy anywhere other than the bedrooms, and the heating bills much be enormous.
But yes, it's down to personal taste. They wouldn't like my house either.