I do not think there was any intention to 'cheat the government'. In fact I believe the SW's motivation was to save her time and the LA's money, by suggesting a perfectly legitimate piece of expenditure which took DU's savings below the limit immediately, rather than have him assessed as having to pay, paying for a couple of months and then having to be re-assessed as below the limit and thereby entitled to have his fees met. He did pay full whack from his savings while the assessment was being carried out which was not refunded and the threshold on savings was soon to rise.
His savings have been further depleted to pay for the special shoes he needs and the proper hospital bed he requires after breaking his hip. Had he been in a nursing home these items would have been supplied free of charge but in a care home the resident pays. Since the Post Office arbitrarily mothballed his savings account, neither he nor myself have any access to it so my sister and I share the cost of his clothing, two replacement watches (the others having been 'lost' while he was in hospital, biscuits and sweets for him, Christmas gifts to care home staff etc. and help with fundraising activities for the home. His 'pocket money' pays for the barber, a daily paper and outings - the rest of his pension goes to the home.
Sorry this is so long but I am
that this 95 year old, former Bevan Boy who worked and paid his taxes and NI should be accused of being a benefit cheat.
Does anyone have a middle name?
Farage’s furious clash with Times editor stuns figures close to him. This will not end well…
Halal and Kosher meat should labelling be mandatory?




