I owned my house.
My dh owned his house.
We got married 12 years ago, been together 20 altogether.
My house was sold and invested to give me an income to supplement gov pension.
My name is on title documents of our home. (What was dh home )
All investments are in joint names. Dh brought a little more to the table than I did.
I did inherit a sum some of which was used to fund some of the expenses taking us (6 adults) all long haul to my ds wedding.
If I had remained single then upon retirement my house would have had to be sold to give me an income and I'd have had to rent.
I have 1 adult dc and dh has 3 adult dc, with 4 grandchildren between us. Dgc and adult dc are all treated the same.
In our very similar Wills...
I have left my dc a modest sum.
All four will then get a £xxxx equal sum, all the dgc will get £xxxx
All else to my dh.
In dh Will he has left £xxxx equal to all 4 adult dc and all the dgc £xxxx. Thereafter all to me.
Whichever one of us is left alone will leave all equally between the 4 adult dc.
Does this sound fair. Reason i ask is.... my very dear best friend suggested I should leave half of my assets to my ds. (At least the value of my original home when I had been single) The other half between my 3 dsc.
However, if I'd been still single I'm sure my home would have been sold to give me an income.
I want to be fair.
Any opinions?
SNP and Greens end coalition deal
Scottish political mess. Is Devolution working?