MargotLedbetter
Germanshepherdsmum
The OP is obviously computer literate. If they are genuine (which I still doubt), all the information is readily to hand online.
I have no idea why you're so cynical. When I went to a Waspi Women meeting a few years ago I encountered a worrying number of women who were unaware of NICs and the date their state pension would kick in.
I sat next to a woman who'd assumed that because she worked part-time in a university cafeteria for years she'd be retiring at 60 on a full state pension. She handed in her notice when she turned 60 and only when nothing happened with her pension did she investigate and discover that not only would she not qualify for the full state pension but she still had several years to go before she was eligible for anything. She wasn't stupid or incompetent, she'd just assumed that everyone got a pension at 60.
I do find myself a bit torn over this.
If you assume, on no basis whatsoever that you will get a State Pension ate age 60, then what are you? Stupid and incompetent are harsh words, so would you say 'not really on the ball' / 'had difficulty understanding' / 'didn't really take any notice' ?
If I, for example, take a car out on the road without insurance, because I didn't realise you needed it, am I stupid and incompetent or what?
I do realise that some of this results from historical misunderstandings, and I completely condemn the failure of the Government to write to all Waspi Women in order to make their position clear.
I have asked some if they didn't see the leaflets and posters, or read / hear articles about it. The usual response is 'not really'.
But are we to make excuses for women because they didn't bother their little heads about their pensions?
To be clear, I am not criticising the small number of women who in order to provide for their families, felt they couldn't afford to pay in to pensions. But I do wonder what on earth women such as this were actually thinking?