"Employers are to blame for importing so many of the unskilled instead of hiring at home" not a quote from the Daily Mail, but Polly Toynbee in last week's Guardian.
Why is it indeed that Eastern Europeans clearly have so much get and go? Here is my conclusion. They have lived under harsh regimes and possibly for them the only way is up. Not for them the toxic trio of poor education, a liberal benefit system and ever growing malignant trashy celebrity culture that seems to have left some trapped in a downward spiral of no job, no hope but paradoxically a weird sense of entitlement that they should be receiving something for nothing. I don't know, but I can imagine that the average Romanian, Bulgarian, Pole or Czech cannot go straight from school to an income supplied by the state without having to do something for it. When did it become OK for us to say that our younger generation, assuming they are fit and healthy, shouldn't have to get up early in the morning to pick fruit and veg. Admittedly this will be seasonal and not some long term career, but seemingly it's OK to import labour from abroad to do these jobs and according to the Home Office, then expect them to live in poor quality, overcrowded conditions with inflated rents. In worst case scenarios unscrupulous gang masters will be keeping them as slaves where they receive very little recompense for their efforts anyway.
So it seems we are to go forward with this concept that our young, who are continually being told they are worse than useless, and lets face it that can't exactly be morale boosting if you desperately want to work but are perpetually passed over in favour of a foreign work force who are deemed to be your superiors in their skills and worth ethic.
In my post that was deleted, I mentioned a black friend of mine who works mentoring black youngsters in South London. These young people simply don't have enough English to conduct an interview, they are our own home grown kids who converse in street slang, in spite of being in our education system for 12 years or so. Years in schools that complacently overlooked their mode of speech and presumably this would have been one of the reasons why Dianne Abbott chose to put her own son in an elitist private London school. David Lammy, Labour MP for Tottenham has commented on the fact that schools do black pupils no favours in letting them use slang to express themselves and it does not prepare them for a life in the workplace. Clearly this will become more of a problem when a foreign workforce can speak better English than the English and it can only reflect badly on our education system. I am not trying to imply that poor language skills are common only to that ethnicity, Tristan Hunt Shadow Education Secretary has also stated that white working class boys chances will have negatively been affected by the mass immigration from Eastern Europe. However, I think we are all ware that black teens are also more likely to be drawn into gang culture and lack of work and opportunities aren't therefore going to help them extricate themselves from that way of life. Some of these kids will no doubt be the descendants of the West Indians invited to come to Britain to work on our railways. Surely we have a greater duty to provide them with some sort of future than the unskilled migrant from Eastern Europe.
Today in the Observer there is an article about a landlord in Kent who has some 1,000 private rental properties. Quite aside as to why anyone should be allowed to own this number of lets, it seems he plans to give notice to tenants who are in receipt of housing benefits, particularly single mothers, in favour of Eastern Europeans. A precedent that would seem quite alarming if others follow suit. Where exactly are they supposed to go when we have such a dire shortage of housing God only knows. It does however bring up the question if we have so many single mothers in receipt of benefits in the UK shouldn't we being doing something to turn that situation around along with our numerous other social problems before we allow more unskilled migrants into our country, such as the Roma and yes I do know they are completely distinct group from their fellow Romanian and Bulgarians. However, the blame for their social pariah status could be laid fairly and squarely at the mono culture of Eastern European countries from which they emanate. They have been in that part of Europe for anything up to a 1000 years so if they haven't been assimilated then it says a lot about the attitudes of those countries to their fellow citizens who they deem to be unlike themselves. It's strange how political parties in Eastern Europe who espouse political views akin to Hitler can get away with it, but we are continually being lectured to by two faced Eurocrats that we could become the nasty man of Europe should we impose restrictions on our benefits. Although the UK is not a utopia, I think we have a far better track record than the average Eastern European given the number of immigrants we have received and assimilated into our country over the past 2,000 years, although not quite the tidal wave we have experienced over the past 6 or 7 years.
As for the fatuous argument that those of us who don't favour wholesale immigration my stage some impromptu hissy fit if we are dealt with by a Romanian or Bulgarian doctor, or indeed any other of their fellow countryman in another walk of life, I don't care who I am dealt with, it's not personal. It's about the finite amount of jobs and the assumption that our young are not able enough to do them, if not, why not? and what's being done about it? It can't be sustainable to have so many young inactive and consigned to life's heap without some sort of dissent setting in the long run.