It doesn't follow that being close to a river, with or without a view and moorings that you will flood. The sites of many of our riverside towns were chosen because, although they are beside a river they are on raised land that does not flood. However in the 19th century as factories expanded and workers flooded into towns, small terrace houses for these workers were often built on the flood plain. These small 19th century houses provide many 21st century house buyers with their first step on the housing ladder. It is easy if you have the money to say do not buy on the flood plain, but if that is all you can afford it is a bit different. DS started house-owning life with a floodplain railway cottage in York.
Much of the flooding that has occurred is not river flooding but groundwater flooding, where the volume of the rain has exceeded the ground's capacity to absorb it. This is the case in my village, we have small streams running through it, as do most communities, but the nearest river is 3 miles away, nevertheless we flooded in 2007 and last week, although fortunately this year few houses were flooded.
I think it is dreadful to say you cannot feel sorry for people who have lost their homes and treasured possessions just because they are well off. They will be suffering just as much emotional pain and grief as those in smaller properties. The Thames side properties that have flooded this year have rarely flooded before so everyone buying near the river how ever much or little they paid had no reason to expect floods like those we have just had.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

I agree about that phrase 'hardworking families' it's trotted out a lot.