We cannot go through life never being judgemental - sometimes it is appropriate. Not everything can be condoned; there are issues of right and wrong. Is it racist to say that Germany was wrong to persecute and exterminate minorities?
Philosophers have long debated where the line should be drawn and sought a definition of objective right and wrong - if we say that all religious practices are fine and we are not allowed to express a negative view, then how, for instance do we stop little girls being mutilated?
There is a difference between denigrating a group for who they are (that is racism) and challenging practices that we find unacceptable (that is legitimate debate). For example, it is fundamentally wrong to condemn someone for their racial origin (e.g.being a Jew) but it is fine to say that there are some practices that you find objectionable (e.g. circumcision). That is not a racist statement, it is a legitimate expression of distaste for an action that you find unacceptable.
There is no certainty about what is right and wrong - but there are different views on this, and it is fine to express them.
I make no apology for stating that I find the waste of food involved in the OP wasteful and unacceptable.
WORD ASSOCIATION - 9th May 2026





