Gransnet forums

News & politics

Labour MP's harassment

(562 Posts)
POGS Thu 03-Dec-15 12:56:04

For a while now there have been reports of Labour MP's being bullied, harassed by left wing activists. They have been threatened with deselection, sent photos of dead babies to put pressure on them to vote on Syria etc.

Yesterday during the Syrian debate many Labour MP's made reference to this happening and Labour MP John Mann called for Cameron to apologise for his words but also said the Labour front bench should also apologise for the harassment the Labour MP's were recieving. Labour MP Stella Creasy literally left the debate to go to her office as the staff were receiving phone abuse and there were anti war campaigners causing them harassment. This point will be refuted by those who attended so we must all make our own decision as to whom we believe.

I mentioned in posts last night how disgusting I think this behaviour is on the Should we bomb Deash/IS thread. I genuinely feel very sorry for the Labour MP's and to be honest I think there is going to be more trouble ahead if the Labour Party do not back their MP's a little harder than has happened so far.

What gives people the right to assume their opinion , their view should not be doubted, not debated and must be adhered to or they resort to threatening behaviour. It is not democratic and I agree with those MP's and commentators who believe this wave of activism is a backward move for the Labour Party..

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 20:26:03

The West is always to blame for all the ills of the world in the opinion of people on the far left. No doubt the bombing Russia engages in is the fault of the West as well as Ukraine, and Crimea. Hence my reference to socialism, obviously criticism of Russia is a big No. No.

POGS Wed 16-Dec-15 20:15:58

There is so much information available to tell you Stop The War considers the West/EU/America are wholely to blame for Ukraine's problems, not Russia.

Perhaps that is why grumppa mentioned Ukraine, just guessing.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 20:07:53

Then why did you bring socialism into it nigglenellie ? it had nothing to do with the bombing of Syria

rosesarered Wed 16-Dec-15 19:56:23

I agree with you niggly of course the protesters of STW should target ALL the embassies if they feel this way and that includes the Russian one.

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 19:26:06

I think any country that behaves towards its neighbours, it's citizens and bombs cities indiscriminately like Russia does should be made to feel the disaproval/disgust/outrage of other people, exactly like western countries do. But for some curious reason it simply never does. I couldn't care what Russia's political system is, it's certainly not democracy as we know it. Why is she never ever criticised by those who are so vocal when it's western countries who offend.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 18:28:37

But they are , you were concerned with them being an allegedly socialist country , I asked should not all countries be condemned , you didn't reply

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 18:07:51

I didn't mention western countries because demonstrations against them are fairly common and no big deal in the way of things. Demonstrations against Russia almost never happen anywhere, whatever they do, even as in this case they are blatently as culpable as any one else, so why are they are virtually never vilified as western countries always are?

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 17:52:15

But nigglenellie, you questioned protesting against Russia because you claim they are a socialist country, now if you had said all countries I could have given my opinion, I got confused when you wanted demonstrations against Russia but not America or France

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 17:45:52

rose, this is exactly what I was trying to say, probably rather clumsily, and that while the pros and cons of bombing are discussed, the discussion never includes people's opinion of what Russia's involvement is, let alone what those who vehemently oppose bombing under any circumstances feel about the indiscriminate bombing conducted by Russia and their support of Assad.
If you're condemning one section of this campaign, surely you must condemn all. I personally am a Hilary Benn supporter over this, with his same feelings of regret. Russia worries me much more as they seem to have no qualms about who, what or how they conduct their campaign, maybe they just have a totally different attitude to other people, and obviously aren't answerable to anyone. I don't think precision bombing is part of their remit, just terrify, destroy and kill whoever.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 17:35:54

risesarered has answred fir you nigglenellie, all not just Russian

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 17:34:27

But nigglenellie only thought protests outside Russian embassy, I post,Italy asked should we also demonstrate outside the French, American and Chinese embassy but no reply

rosesarered Wed 16-Dec-15 17:04:50

Not a silly question at all, in fact a very sensible one. Anyone against us bombing certain targets in Syria, should also be against ANY other country who is doing the same, by demos outside their embassies.In fact, it doesn't make sense NOT to really.
Could it be, that within the ranks of STW hides a rag bag of anarchists,( along with any genuine pacifists) and others who hate Britain as it is, a capitalist country, and use any means possible to name call and disrupt and bad mouth their own country.Discuss!

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 17:00:40

You don't know the first thing about me or I you. A lot of your posts are silly too, but most of us on here are too polite to say so. What is it with you that you can't answer questions pleasantly?

durhamjen Wed 16-Dec-15 16:59:08

You beat me to it, Anniebach.
Stop the War is a coalition of parties. It is not just socialist or far left.

stopwar.org.uk/index.php/news/the-task-of-any-anti-war-movement-is-to-oppose-its-own-government

However silly stories are coming out attacking it, because it is very effective. The number of supporters has doubled since the vote to bomb Syria.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 16:42:15

It was a rather silly question, STW which is a mix of all parties and no party, should protest outside the Russian embassy because you think they are a socialist country but not outside the USA embassy or the Chinese or French embassy? How can you expect an answer to such a pointless question , don't think you want an answer your just want to bring socialism into it

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 16:33:25

I'm not a supporter of anything. I just asked what I consider to be a valid question. Sadly no valid answer, which is hardly surprising I suppose.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 16:30:39

Shall we demonstrate outside the USA embassy?

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 16:29:16

So you are are a supporter of don't do as we do as we say?

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 15:50:08

No that's not what anyone is saying. I begged the question as to why STW wasn't as vocal in Russia's participation of the bombing in Syria as it is to Western involvement, and wondering if if this could be because Russia's position is an embarrassment to the far left bearing in mind Russia is a supposedly socialist country, and protesting against their actions by a far left organisation would be out of kilter . That's all.

grumppa Wed 16-Dec-15 15:35:11

Not what I was saying at all.

nightowl Wed 16-Dec-15 15:12:33

Forgive me for butting into this thread but having read the last few posts I'm feeling a tad confused. Are we saying it's only ok to protest against our own government policy if we are equally willing to share out the protest against all other governments following similar or equally bad policy? Otherwise it's better just to sit back and not bother protesting at all? Gosh. What a defeatist attitude.

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 15:09:46

I would have said they can grumppa, provided it's peaceful and not on Russian territory, but whether they want to is another matter. A demonstration against Russian involvement elsewhere would do, but don't expect it any time soon. The Russians, as I understand it, are far less discerning as to where they drop their weapons, being a law unto themselves and answerable to no one. Very frightening, and deeply worrying. But STW including their star member doesnt seem perplexed, so it must be ok.

grumppa Wed 16-Dec-15 14:49:09

So am I to assume that the only reason those who are against bombing in Syria don't demonstrate outside the Russian Embassy is because they can't? Will STW confirm this?

Sounds a bit half-hearted to me.

nigglynellie Wed 16-Dec-15 14:48:07

Let's face it if we're honest, whatever and whoever we support, one thing you can be certain of that every single one is as hypocritical as the next. What or who defines a socialist country? The only one that comes to mind is Venezuela, and they're now virtually bankrupt and lawless. Is there a better example? North Korea perhaps. I think Russia perceives itself as a socialist state, China too!! Tell that to the displaced including young children, tell it to the human rights lawyer; Will rent a mob protest, almost certainly No! It's such double standards, but then sadly all politics is.

Anniebach Wed 16-Dec-15 14:25:07

I didn't know Russia was a socialist country either