Theresa May

1st paragraph. Same old argument.
In elections there is never say over 50% is there? So it doesnt wash.

Sorry,I made a little mistake, but whether they should come under the Dubs arrangement or because they have family here is immaterial. They have a right to come here, but never mind, much better to quibble about the details than let them come.

'Citizens UK says that to date the only children transferred from France to Britain have been those with family in the UK, largely involving those supported by its Safe Passage partnership: “This process takes months and at the present rate it will take over a year to help the 178 children identified,” said a Citizens UK statement. “To date not one child has been transferred from France to Britain under the wider provisions of the Dubs amendment.” '

@obieone

That's an ever better reason to change the first past the post system!

Interesting interview with a foster carer who looked after refugee children. She did point out, what many people suspect, that most of them were older male teenagers, some of whom said they were 15, but obviously weren't, many of them disappeared after a couple of weeks to join their friends elsewhere in the country. Maybe if we offered to take all the girls, who are most vulnerable, we would find there weren't many.

Oh dear nottoold - "avoiding the draft" is an interesting way of spinning "being bullied into fighting in a civil war" or even "being bullied into fighting for ISIL/DEASH.
If it was a 16 year old grandson you want him stuck in a dangerous refugee camp in Calais? Or, as things are going, on the streets of Calais with hundreds of migrant men, at risk of all kinds of crime.
It is clear that the government are dragging their feet deliberately and being incredibly mean and uncharitable about taking refugees from this conflict. Makes me ashamed of my country.

Ashamed of your country?!! So France, a civilised European country bears no responsibility for vulnerable children caught up in a place of great danger inside its own borders but the UK does?!!! You're surely not serious JessM? I'd be much more ashamed at being French!

I'd be ashamed to be French too! Doesn't mean our government are in any way compassionate or even reasonable on this. Compare and contrast with Germany.

Germany?!!! I think you'll find they're regretting at leisure their somewhat chaotic immigration policy! This year we're seeing a more circumspect attitude all over Europe and less open door!!! As has been previously stated, a lot of these 'children' turn out to be older than we're led to believe and after a while simply disappear. The initial responsibility lies with France to make sure that these youngsters are in a place of safety until a permanent arrangement can be sorted out in collaboration with the UK.

Jess - point taken re any DGS of mine but I was merely quoting what I heard on Today. As for Germany, compassionate though they may be, politically Mutti Merkel has much opposition to her open door policy and things do not look good for her in the coming election.

Some people on here are all heart, aren't they?

I'm with you, Jess, ashamed of the way we treat refugees.
On the news today the French are talking about closing the Jungle again.

It's easy for those in this country to criticise mainland European countries for not doing the right thing, because we are not an easy country to get to overland.
It doesn't absolve us from any responsibility.

No one on here has said anything about absolving us from responsibility. What has been said is that it is surely the responsibility initially of the French, (as these children are on their territory) to make sure that they are in a place of safety until their future can be resolved in collaboration with the UK. Nothing heartless in that!

As I said, which you ignored, it's easy for Brits to pretend it's the fault of the French. We have a channel or the North Sea between us and mainland Europe, where these refugees are.
We signed an agreement which said we would take children who had family here. We haven't even done that.
I am ashamed of the attitude of people in this country who say it's not our fault if they go through France first. It's a ridiculous cop-out.

If we are not trying to escape our responsibility, why are these children not in the UK now?

So it's fine for the French not to take any responsibility for vulnerable children even on a temporary basis, and ok to shrug their shoulders and leave them to ???! What a weird attitude!! Imagine the outcry, quite properly, if this situation was outside Dover?! 'Nothing to do with us? Someone else's fault, Shrug!!' I don't think so!! I think we would provide some sort of protection from God knows who until a permanent solution could be found on both sides of the channel! But, hey ho, the French are completely exonerated for turning a blind eye! What a strange train of thought that is dj!

www.thecanary.co/2016/09/02/britain-returned-racism-70s-governments-fault/

This isn't said by the Canary, but by the Institute for Race Relations, and it's the fault of the Home Office, which has been run by Theresa May for years.

Well at least it makes a change from blaming Brexit!

What's this got to do with the French not protecting vulnerable children. Are you suggesting it is for racist reasons?!

Just dj changing the subject as usual. Anything to get a dig in at Theresa May.

Niggly, according to Eurostat figures, France had 70,000+ applicants for asylum and we had 38,000+ in 2015, and France accepts more asylum seekers than we do, so how come you accuse the French of not taking responsibility? Where do you get your information from?

Sorry, I thought the thread was entitled Theresa May.

Not entitled to get a dig in at Theresa May on a thread about Theresa May?
What am I allowed to do?

By the way, niggly, the situation is outside Dover. There just happens to be a channel in between.
Why are you pretending it's not to do with the British?
The children there are trying to get to Britain, and have the right to be here. The government is trying all sorts of ways to stop them coming here, including blaming the French, aided and abetted by the Brexiteers.

I didn't say you were 'not entitled', just that you had changed the subject. Can you not see that? I suppose I should be used to the diliberate misinterpretation of posts by now though...

Which Brexiteers are aiding and abetting the government? I think we should be told!

FGS dj, all I'm saying is that these children are on French soil, and in a camp run by the French. Surely it is incumbent upon them to protect vulnerable children until such time as their families can be located and verified.

Where are these so called vulnerable children's parents, if they are so vulnerable how did they manage to get all the way to Calais by themselves. A lots of the jungle residents (I am not saying all the children) looks very undesirable to me and I certainly don't want them here, they should be accessed by the French and sent back home to their own country.

As you say, how did unaccompanied children get there. How for that matter did any of the refugees get to Calais? I don't imagine that they walked from Greece or where ever!!! A network of transport? Why did they not claim asylum in the first safe country they reached? Why is the UK so attractive, particularly with such a wicked government?!

Is Mrs May/Conservative Party responsible for the sea surrounding the UK?!!! Will Mr Corbyn fill it all in if or when he gets to power?!! answers on a post card please!!! (sorry for the tongue in cheek comments)