Gransnet forums

News & politics

Childhood obesity strategy "lite"

(282 Posts)
gillybob Thu 18-Aug-16 22:09:08

Personally I think the thinking here is all wrong . My 3 DGC, girls 10 and 8 and little boy 6 all eat like horses. In fact you can't fill the middle one, she is always hungry. They eat lots and lots of good food. They are all extremely sporty ( football, gymastics, swimming, running, climbing, riding etc) and they don't have a pick of fat between them. They have muscles like little Popeyes !

I rest my case .

JessM Thu 18-Aug-16 21:43:52

Yes of course pbleone the vast lobbying power of the food industry is lurking in the wings.
I don't think the "parents should do better" argument is very helpful. The food industry has at its disposal huge amounts of money to spend on sales and marketing - all designed to manipulate the behaviour of shoppers. It is only the better educated and less stressed parents who are likely to study food labels and work out how much sugar is in a "serving" of yogurt or 100g of cereal. Tried analysing the information on a cereal packet lately?
Meanwhile 10% of all the money that the NHS spends is on diabetes - much of it preventable if we stopped eating vast quantities of refined sugar.
If you have ever read The Road to Wigan Pier you will have been struck by the diet of poor people in the 1930s.
And it is still the case that the poorest children from (on average) the least well-educated families who have the worst diets.

Hard hitting critique from well known medical figure:
www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2016/aug/18/governments-response-obesity-diabetes-nhs?CMP=share_btn_tw

Jalima Thu 18-Aug-16 20:54:18

We have become rather used to a 'Nanny State' and people need to take more responsibility for their own actions.
However, manufacturers have a responsibility too. One young mother said it was cheaper to buy sweets, cakes, chocolates etc for her children as they were often buy one get one free and fruit and vegetables are not sold like that, but I wonder if she has done a price comparison.

Personally I dislike the 'no added sugar' soft drinks as I would avoid aspartame, but it is quite difficult to buy any drinks without artificial sweeteners nowadays.

Ana Thu 18-Aug-16 20:45:43

I don't think the measures that have been dropped would have persuaded parents who already ignore health/obesity warnings to change their shopping habits, unless prices were increased dramatically, which was never going to happen.

It's very difficult to change people's habits, especially by telling them it's for their own (or their children's) good!

rosesarered Thu 18-Aug-16 20:39:49

I think that the PM is trying a lighter approach rather than being heavy handed with manufacturers at a time when the country needs to keep it's jobs.
I would like to see parents doing what they should be doing ie.Looking after the welfare of their own children and not buying some of that sweet sugary yukky stuff.

obieone Thu 18-Aug-16 20:29:44

Am I alone in thinking governments can be a bit bought in this country nowadays?

On the plus side, a town about 4o miles from me that used to have a problem with oversizing, is now looking decidedly better in that regard.
I have no idea if the town is a one-off, or if oversizing is on the decrease nationally.

JessM Thu 18-Aug-16 19:57:54

Under Cameron the Dept of Health was toiling away, developing a strategy for reducing childhood obesity, which seems to be steadily rising, fuelled my all those sugary drinks and snacks and exacerbated by the lack of activity in young lives.
Today we have the final version released, with several ideas removed.
Sugar tax on soft drinks will add a few pence per can/bottle.
Encourage food producers to reduce the sugar content of foods. breakfast cereals, yoghurts, biscuits, cakes, confectionery, morning goods (e.g. pastries), puddings, ice cream and sweet spreads.
And some warm words about promoting 60mins exercise per day (50% in school)
The content has been criticised because plans to crack down on special offers on things like cakes and biscuits have been withdrawn and again it is a light touch "lets try and persuade food producers" approach rather than anything more punitive.
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/546588/Childhood_obesity_2016__2__acc.pdf

Will any of this actually do a thing to encourage parents (particularly those on low incomes) to reduce their children's consumption of pop, sweets, chocolate, cake, biscuits and ice-cream? And is a slight reduction in the sugar in cereals or baked beans going to make a difference?