Bags the evidence is still not at all conclusive that there is a need for major changes to provide more service at weekends.
It has long been the case the SHOs and registrars work at weekends in areas where they are needed - emergency admissions, wards where people are very sick, maternity etc. It is possible that they need more consultant cover at weekends in some areas but Hunt has not chosen to tackle this issue.
Other than that, there is no urgent need. Some people might like to have an outpatients appointment at weekends - but there is no urgency about this. Any changes will have inevitable cost implications.
The "junior" doctors (i.e. anyone who works in a hospital below consultant level) are incensed in part because they are very bright people who can see no logic or benefit to anyone in Hunt's attempts to re-arrange the way they work.
It is already a difficult and demanding job, with the requirement that they move hospitals every year (with little or no choice about where in their region they are sent) and the requirement that they keep doing exams through their 20s and beyond in order to get to the stage where they can apply to a consultant post in a hospital of their choice - when they get into their 40s.
This is incredibly disruptive for any woman wanting to have a family, or a settled family life. Hunt's contract changes, they argue, will make life more difficult for women doctors to work and to progress in their careers.
I am not surprised that many of them have concluded that Hunt is attempting to undermine the NHS with this policy. Along with others, such as removal of bursaries for nursing students and cutting the amount of money hospitals need to operate effectively.