Freedom of speech

Charming!

How did I guess!

What did you guess ww? Surely not that POGS was dim?!!! One unpleasant comment followed by another! Time to jump ship - again!!

WW

What is dim in my opinion is there are posters who have/do/might believe links/posts because they naturally ally themselves with fellow minded posters who have set them up.

They want to believe in the Fake News/Clickbait because it suits their desire to equate themselves with the rubbish posted as it for the most part is usually being salacious/attacking the character of somebody they hate/dislike.

To answer your post :-

"Blimey pogs surely you aren't so dim as to be able make your own judgement over links?"

No I am not dim and I can make my own judgement over links thank you for asking.

With all these calls for Trump to be impeached, which is up to the Americans and the American legal and political system, I would like to know what would happen if he were to be impeached successfully? Not the process, but what would happen next?
Could 'next' be an even worse scenario?

Pence would take office... as Ford, Nixon's VP did when Nixon resigned.

What would happen if Pence was then impeached?
How many impeachments make a new election?

Whitewave, I find it very funny that the person who doesn't like links and says she never reads my ilnks then asks me for a link - on the same thread.
She must be very confused. Particularly as the link she asked me for was already there.

Impeachment doesn't automatically mean dismissal! Clinton proved that! but then of course he was the 'right' party so perhaps perjury, and obstructing the course of justice doesn't matter so long as you're not a Republican, then of course it does!

That was at the end of his two terms, not in the first few weeks.
Trump actually boasted at the time that he was worse with women than Clinton. Just locker-room talk for him, I guess.
Trump is actually going against the constitution of the USA.

It will be interesting to see whether the US system imposes sufficient checks on the actions of the President to limit his power to do what he says.

I freely admit that I am not an expert on the US Constitution but its legal system has been robust enough to bring banks accused of offences to book where other systems had not acted. It also took action against certain members of FIFA when other countries did not.

I am not a fan of Trump but I wonder how the loudest critics will react if they find themselves in an ever-closer union with Marine Le Pen.

OH I see, the fact of committing perjury and obstructing the course of justice is alright so long as its during a second term of office. Thats ok then!!!!! Selective, but ok!!!

durhamjen, if your sarky jibe about links was aimed at me, I certainly did not ask for a link. I asked you who you were quoting in one of your miraculously link-free posts.

We do have to be so careful these days, don't we?

I was quoting from the previous link, as I told you.

And as I told you, I didn't ask you 'for a link'. Do try to get your facts right, you are sounding very confused.

Have I posted this before? Seems quite apt.

Well I haven't seen it, but exactly how I am feeling.

Is a link about a link about a link known as a hyperlink?

...and a link about a link about a link, a hyperbolink?

Now now Jalima and Cunco levity is not be encouraged on this thread!

Duly chastised

I should think so too! This is the thread for argy bargy, not pleasantries and jokes, dontcha know!

It's about anything. Freedom of speech and all that....

Indeed you're right Durham but the aggressive and combatitive posts are extremely off putting and dissuade many people from posting. But we've been here before so I'll leave you to carry on........