Can we really Trust Teresa May with a blank cheque?

And of course we haven't looked at immigration nor her ineffectualness and cock up over expelling a couple of terrorists.

Exactly Jane, but don't expect any of the rest to agree with you.

jane compare her time in the Home Office with say Goves or Osborne. I certainly hated what they did but no one can accuse them of ineffectuality, like May, - at the end of the day she takes the flak as head of the department, but was extremely good at reputation management.

I think so too Jane

Blimey you've all been going at it on this thread!
The way some posts read it looks like Theresa May has single handedly and entirely on her own done/failed to have done all sorts of things. However, she is only one person and there are literally hundreds of people behind the work of all these departments. She can't personally be responsible.
For what its worth ( and I can hear some of you saying 'thats not much'!), I think history will see her as a person having to clear up a mess not of her own making and trying to make the best of it.
After all - who else could do it?!

You're so funny whitewave! Or not...

dj Ed was accused of being a communist and red Ed by the Tories at the time!!! as I said in a previous post May has either had a Damascus incident or chasing every vote in her pursuit of Kim Jong-May - by bet is with the latter.

Actually I don't mind TMay borrowing anything that was Ed Miliband's idea, or anybody else's if it happens to be a good idea.

Further to Mediocre May's record in Home Office

Let's look at her record dealing with the police

Many of the more disturbing tendencies of policing has become worse under May's tenure.

Operation Midland was one of the most disgraceful episodes in Policing history.

Millions of pounds were spent on this sinister debacle and the fact that both senior investigating officers emerged from this catastrophe with their jobs says a lot about May's lack of judgement.

May has also reversed many policing techniques that have now ensured greater alienation of the police from the public.
Many of May's cuts may well ensure that some police forces are made unfit for purpose.

So thanks to these deep cuts and her disdainful attacks on police culture she left the Home Office with police morale at its lowest ever.

Thanks to google from all sorts of sources.

Oops, you made the same mistake again Djen

Sorry, Theresa Me.

Thersa Me's latest.

www.indy100.com/article/general-election-2017-theresa-may-prime-minister-ed-miliband-policies-energy-price-cap-7725806

Pleased that the i has noticed this.

It wasn't even anything from this thread.....

Yes, it is quite a confusing remark.

Being called unchristian when you are not a christian?
That's quite logical
It would be more insulting to call a non-christian a christian surely?

Or is it me?

I am still livid about being called unchristian - a completely religiously motivated attack as I am not a Christian

What?

I play no part in this at all.I have not even mentioned deleted posts, you have GGM2 let alone any 'crowing'
You are now harassing and arguing with me for no reason at all, other than a long held grudge.That's the last comment from me to you.Anything more will be ignored.

You coming back on to crow about getting other posts deleted.

I must have missed that post. I thought rosesarered was pointing our that GNHQ was requesting that courtesy be maintained otherwise they will delete the thread.

No roses, I just want you to recognise the part you play in this; you seem to think you are blameless. Do I care about the thread being deleted - yes - but I would put the blame at your door not mine. I am still livid about being called unchristian - a completely religiously motivated attack as I am not a Christian - and it WAS interesting to hear what GNHQ had to say about that. And then what do we have? You coming back on to crow about getting other posts deleted. If you can do that roses why oh why would others not put their view about your manners forward.

GGM2 it is you who are overstepping the mark on this thread, my comments have been entirely civil.
I find your posts rather odd and convoluted.
If you carry on with this argy bargy then GNHQ will delete the thread, is this what you want perhaps?

Oops. I should have said you have my greatest sympathy if you feel you lack comprehension as you say.

As I say, you offered the opportunity for a nice little chat about just what courtesy and overstepping the mark is Roses - or do you think the request doesn't include you.

GGM2 I can rarely make out what you are saying.However, since it was you and one other poster being personal and insulting, I wouldn't harp on it I I were you.
GNHQ have asked posters to have a bit of courtesy, is this too much to expect .

Yes, but GracesgranMK2 I don't really understand the attack on rosesarered that's why I queried it because I believe you made some 'predictions' on another thread too - they are just thoughts and musings and there is no harm in that surely?

Is there something wrong with being benign Jalima or do you see 'benign' as a weakness and only those wielding cudgels in order to beat up the poor and disposed as leaders?

This is another post that is puzzling because nothing I said warranted that reply.

thought though

Thank you Jalima ....it seems as if few recognise that they are being personal/ insulting etc until GN step in and point it out!

Always interesting to hear what they have to say about the reasons why those posts are made thought Roses.