Exactly, whitewave.
Lots more where those came from.
I agree with this statement as well.
"Mogg should be censured by the Speaker/Parliament in my view. His voting record seems to confirm that his role as an MP has been compromised by certain personal beliefs he holds. Not good in my view. He is being subjective about issues when in fact the art of good rule (management?) is to take a more balanced, objective view and deal with the realities of rape and sexual politics. The idea is to help people like rape victims and those who wish live together same sex or not. It should not be about being punitive.
To rule is to rule for everyone – including women who have been impregnated against their will and same-sex couples who wish to show their love and commitment to each other (and, why not?).
In giving his personal views (his judgements?) on the above, Mogg has negated these people – he is excluding them – not including them and thus rendering their needs lesser than others."
If you think that makes me seem virtuous, Baggs, then I'll accept that. I always thought that being virtuous was seen to be a good thing, not a criticism, as you seem to put it.