in fact we'll probably slump a bit, sulk a bit, then get things together.
This is the bit which very few Leavers seem to have lofully comprehended. If we leave without a deal it will be a far bigger catastrophe than leaving with a poor deal. It won't be a 'bit of hardship', it'll be no planes flying, huge queues at borders, food shortages, WTO rules (which are not at all good and the only country which trades wholly under WTO is a very poor slave economy), no radiotherapy for cancer patients, no exports to the EU (our biggest market) as the regulatory framework under which there is free movement of goods throughout the EU would immediately cease to apply etc. etc. etc. All this would happen because there are no contingency plans in place for it (if there were then 'business' wouldn't be panicking so badly and demanding clarity fron the government.)
This isn't the dead easy 'leaving a club' analogy which Leavers have been blithely fed and which most seem to have uncrtically fallen for. This is untangling 40+ years of regulatory agreement, of trade agreements wholly and legally based on that regulatory agreement. This is the stuff that EU law experts like Michael Duggan was telling us about pre referendum and which was pooh poohed as project fear (or self interest!)
The ever optimistic lemon points out that Leave voters did include higher educated people but I'll point out, yet again, that there were fewer of them. Most of the more highly educated voters voted Remain.
And I think she should read Richard North's blog...
www.eureferendum.com/archive.aspx