Gransnet forums

News & politics

Prince Harry’s engagement

(683 Posts)
MawBroon Mon 27-Nov-17 10:23:29

Hope this is not “fake news” but relief from the endless speculation.
Good luck to them! ??

eazybee Tue 28-Nov-17 08:05:28

paddyann, you were not one of the posters I was referring to. Every one is entitled to express their opinion and it doesn't have to be the same as mine. No, the ones I am thinking of seem a particularly joyless bunch, fuelled by a hatred of anything they consider to be part of the Establishment, or don't like: government, Royals, the church, anyone with money, dog-lovers, to name but a few. If you don't agree with them you are, in their words , as bad as the people they are denigrating. Then they resort to swearing.

maryeliza54 Tue 28-Nov-17 08:16:41

eazybee when you disagree with a poster why not say openly to the individual poster ( as I am doing to you now) rather than just posting sweeping generalisations which roll up everything( fact, fantasy and totally unfounded assertions) and make ridiculous comments about people’s joblessness, hatred etc. There are much worse things than swearing on GN - such as nasty vindictive posts like yours which are personal attacks masquerading as a general comment. Grow a pair

maryeliza54 Tue 28-Nov-17 08:17:35

Joblessness - I have a job

Oldwoman70 Tue 28-Nov-17 08:24:55

Yet again a thread on GN has descended to snipes and name calling. Would it not be possible for people to be able to post an opinion (any opinion) without others insulting them.

Lots of GNs are happy about and interested in the news of the engagement, others are not - cannot we respect each others views?

nigglynellie Tue 28-Nov-17 08:31:38

FGS maryeliza, give it a rest! No one is criticising anyone for being a republican, but surely even the most ardent republican can wish a newly engaged couple well?! How churlish and childish to use their accident of birth as a stick to beat them. Even Jeremy Corbin seemed to genuinely wish them well. I agree the press attention is, and sadly will be, very tiresome but that's NOT their fault - how can they stop a free press.! If nothing else think of all that lovely tourist money and rejoice! wine

annsixty Tue 28-Nov-17 08:34:27

I am very happy for them both, they seem well suited and grounded but I do think that now it is their own affair.
Yesterday the 6pm news was almost all taken over by it and today the DT has several pages and a special supplement devoted to their news.
We are going to be awash by the spring.
Let them get on with their lives without endless speculation.

Anniebach Tue 28-Nov-17 08:34:33

As harry is 6th in line to the throne and will soon be 7th I think the wedding should be in St George's Windsor, as Edward's wedding was. Less costly than Westminster Abbey , less guests .

annsixty Tue 28-Nov-17 08:39:02

I think as a divorcee, they should follow the example of his father and have a registery office marriage and a blessing.
I know that is nothing to do with me, just my opinion.

annsixty Tue 28-Nov-17 08:40:40

That should of course be ceremony, the marriage is what follows as their life together.

Anniebach Tue 28-Nov-17 08:47:14

But the Anglican Church does now allow divorcees to marry in church on two conditions, neither was at fault in the break up of the first marriage and IF the priest of the church agrees. I think Windsor and not virginal white with full train and six bridesmaids please.

And let's hope our TVs stations which will swamp us with replaying the wedding will not also give us america's tv station coverage too

BlueBelle Tue 28-Nov-17 08:48:58

Of course those against are fully entitled to their views and are completely free to express them without being verbally beaten up BUT why the necessary to keep going on and on over and over expressing the same thing We know those of you who are anti you have told us, we have heard, we have accepted, please go and talk about something else
If I hated spiders I wouldn’t sit in a room with a big one crawling around why put yourself through the discomfort of listening to those who are all excited ( I m not by the way but I m happy for them)

eazybee Tue 28-Nov-17 08:50:16

Oh, I forget. Wolf whistles aren't popular either.
Maryeliza, if you don't have television or newspapers, how will you know what THE DRESS LOOKS LIKE!!!!

Iam64 Tue 28-Nov-17 08:53:22

The CofE is happy to marry people who have been divorced. There's no reason they shouldn't have a Church wedding if that's what they want.
I was a Republican throughout much of my life, with constant requests from my father to name anyone who I thought could replace the Queen as head of state. I got a bit stuck after Nelson Mandela and Archbishop TuTu. I'm less radical these days on some issues, the monarchy being one. The notion of Trump, Putin and co being our H of S is beyond me.
Many of my pals are Republicans and I respect their views, as I do those posting here. What I don't understand is the level of hostility shown to those of us who are pleased that this young couple are planning a life together. Maybe a new OP on whether we should become a Republic and who we believe could do a better job than the Queen as head of state could be started by someone who cares enough.

lemongrove Tue 28-Nov-17 08:58:24

I think the chapel at Windsor would be a good choice.
I am a republican but cannot see how being one means you have to say insulting things about the present RF.
Especially about a young couple happy to be engaged.
Yes,the press coverage will be OTT, but that isn’t their fault is it?
You can choose to turn the tv off or over if it gets too much.

Anniebach Tue 28-Nov-17 09:05:15

Lemon, I wish them happiness , but hope we don't get more interviews like yesterday , I like the British way of not gushing ?

lemongrove Tue 28-Nov-17 09:06:38

I didn’t watch it Annie tchgrin

Anniebach Tue 28-Nov-17 09:10:25

I did Lemon , sad

DanniRae Tue 28-Nov-17 09:16:36

Having read all 7 pages on here (phew!) I'd really like to add my good wishes to the happy couple and say that I am looking forward to another Royal Wedding BUT not all the media hype. That drives me crazy - however I fully agree that it's not the fault of the Royals.

TerriBull Tue 28-Nov-17 09:19:13

I think most of us knew the announcement was coming, I'm not a mad keen royalist, equally I don't have too many negative feelings about them either. I feel happy for Prince Harry, whilst he was born into a life of privilege, to lose a much loved mother at such a tender age has clearly affected him, and whilst he won't be alone in that, he has had the eyes of the world on him following his every move, his mistakes, weaknesses and flaws are subjet to such scrutiny that I sometimes feel that negates all the advantages of his birth. I think Megan has been a saviour for him, she is certainly a lovely woman and comes across very well. I think it's a positive imo that he's chosen someone with different facets to what would have once been considered the ideal.

Good luck to them both I wish them a happy life.

radicalnan Tue 28-Nov-17 09:53:29

I thnk the media coverage is killing it a bit...........enough already! I can be happy for them and the tourist trade without hearing the same thing every ten minutes.

Jalima1108 Tue 28-Nov-17 10:04:23

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Jalima1108 Tue 28-Nov-17 10:05:16

I presume you meant accurate - I was not trying to 'accurse' you in any way me

Jalima1108 Tue 28-Nov-17 10:08:33

radicalnan I agree - it's the media frenzy that is very offputting. And now we will have inevitable comparisons between Meghan and Kate - and whether or not they get on. The whole of the media seems to have become an extended version of 'Hello'.

At least we are not hearing so much about Pippa these day

paddyann Tue 28-Nov-17 10:09:14

for all those we think they're a lovely couple a great match etc etc etc ...YOU dont know them...they neither know you nor care that you even exist.All the public is to the royal family is a source of income.As for harry losing his mother ....hundreds of kids will have lost their mothers that year ,,do we shower tham all with privilege ..do we still call them all poor boy/girl ? Its a lot of monsense !1 He's all the man he'll ever be and obviously happy with what his privileged life has given him...as to to the TRUMP or.PUTIN as president ...grow up...there are brilliant presidents all around the world.They do their job,they get paid for a limited time ,they dont have multiple homes or hundreds of hangers on and they do just fine ....and they get voted out after a few short years .

nigglynellie Tue 28-Nov-17 10:12:53

Like you annie, I dislike gushing, but a lot of people don't, hence the wall to wall coverage!! We turned from the news
onto Eggheads yesterday as it was clearly going to be about this engagement for the whole programme. Not the fault of the young couple though, so no adverse feelings for them, just the BBC going on and on (and on!)
Republic or Monarchy? I don't have strong feelings either way but on balance I would rather have the Queen as head of state as like you TeriBull I cannot think of one other person who could come anywhere near the excellent job she does.