Your topic thread Annibach draws attention to the persecution of Labour Party members who speak out against JC's support and encouragement of antisemite views within the party, largely as you will know better than most stemming from JC's long history of aligning himself with terrorist groups, amongst them Hamas. As recently as 2017 receiving financial campaign support from Ibrahim Hamami who is described as a vitriolic opponent of the Oslo peace accords and a supporter of the current wave of stabbings of Jews in Israel and a founder director of the pro-Hamas group Palestinian Affairs Centre by Andrew Gilligan.
With this level of involvement with just one that I have found pro Hamas influential supporter and activist, who lives in London by the way, there may be more. Is it any wonder that those who challenge his antisemite views in his own party are doomed to failure, persecution and ridicule.
Since he does not intend to change his political stance and support for Hamas and other terror groups in Palestine, he is hardly likely to acknowledge the complaints of people in the LP. He will and is getting rid of the irritant as he will regard them - those people who stand up to his anti-Semitic views whilst protecting and supporting of those in the LP who have been in dormant agreement with Corbyn over many decades and now in power, they are free to speak of their activist core beliefs and support Corbyn more openly within the Party.
You mentioned the IRA Anniebach. Your knowledge of this time in the LP with the JC activist's, including Ken Livingstone who has been protected by JC until recently, when he had no choice but to "let him go" to save himself from the spotlight being shone on their joint association with the IRA, in the form of Gerry Adams and Martin McGuiness et al over four decades. Livingstone and Corbyn as young politician attended the illegal IRA "funeral" of Bobby Sands. There is much evidence of Corbyn and Livingstones close association and support of the IRA terrorists and later when the IRA brought the fight to the ballot box in the form of a Political party in order to survive and legitimise their past.
What is disturbing about the Corbyn et al support for activist groups, with terrorist inclinations is that with that goes an unbalanced view of who those groups are against. By supporting one side so entirely, Corbyn et al loose the ability to see both sides of the issue, therefore can only support peace and harmony as seen by one side the side they are supporting. The deceit is what get's to me, the pretence of an amiable balanced hail -fellow -well met sort, when actually all his political life he has been a supporter of violent change in the form of terrorism. That should not surprise me since if as we believe he is, a Trotsky communist, then violent uprising is what he will believe in. Read Marx and Trotsky, both out of another time, with solutions for a time two Centuries ago now. But clearly Corbyn still has one foot in that grave.
Anniebach you know these guys and you have seen through the facade for years. It's good that these things are being challenged by Labour Party members and some in the Parliamentary Labour group, but as you say, there seems little support for those being persecuted for speaking out right now.