Another attack by the ‘fear’ campaign is to accuse the ERG of intransigence, of insisting on a crazy purity. In fact, the ERG has sacrificed a great deal that it holds dear to seek some consensus.
Its members recently voted for the Brady amendment, which accepted Mrs May’s deal so long as she took the backstop out of it. It devised, with ‘sensible’ Remainers like Nicky Morgan and Damian Green, something called the Malthouse compromise. It is, as its name suggests, a compromise.
In return, the ERG gets no thanks. Its concessions are pocketed, and then it is assailed once more. Within days of accepting Brady, Mrs May moved surreptitiously from promising to “replace” the backstop, to “changing” the backstop, to “making changes” in the backstop.
Brexiteers are amused to hear Remainers complaining that she gives them an unfair slice of her attention. In reality, she makes herself inscrutable to both sides, but reserves her animosity for Leavers.
It is now much too late in the day to persuade many people to change their minds either way on the issue of Brexit itself.
But it should at least be obvious that when anti-Brexit MPs hum and haw about what they want and don’t want, they relieve Brussels of any need to make its own hard choices. You will have seen pictures this week of Mr Juncker with Mrs May and he looked happy.
It cannot be said often enough that if MPs want a good deal for Britain they have to convince the EU that, if we don’t get one, we shall leave anyway. Mrs May, in her heart of hearts, cannot face this. Uncoincidentally, she has got a very bad deal so far.