Gransnet forums

News & politics

Ten damning conclusions from the new UN poverty report

(124 Posts)
GracesGranMK3 Fri 24-May-19 08:22:39

These are extracts The Common Space has made from the report. My thoughts are that surely anyone who voted for this wretched state of affairs could not vote for the government that caused it a second time - not if they have an ounce of humanity.

Dickensian Britain
"It might seem to some observers that the Department of Work and Pensions has been tasked with designing a digital and sanitised version of the nineteenth century workhouse, made infamous by Charles Dickens, rather than seeking to respond creatively and compassionately to the real needs of those facing widespread economic insecurity in an age of deep and rapid transformation brought about by automation, zero-hour contracts and rapidly growing inequality."

Employment is no escape from poverty
“Almost 60 per cent of those in poverty in the United Kingdom are in families where someone works, and a shocking 2.9 million people are in poverty in families where all adults work full-time. According to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, 10 per cent of workers over 16 are in insecure employment. And 10 years after the 2008 financial crisis, employees’ median real earnings are, remarkably, still below pre-crisis levels.”

Eat or heat
“People said they had to choose either to eat or heat their homes. Children are showing up at school with empty stomachs, and schools are collecting food and sending it home because teachers know their students will otherwise go hungry. And 2.5 million people in the United Kingdom survive with incomes no more than 10 per cent above the poverty line –just one crisis away from falling into poverty.”

Homeless Britain
“In England, homelessness rose 60 per cent between 2011 and 2017 and rough sleeping rose 165 per cent from 2010 to 2018. The charity Shelter estimates that 320,000 people in Britain are now homeless, and recent research by Crisis suggests that 24,000 people are sleeping rough or on public transportation –more than twice government estimates. Almost 600 people died homeless in England and Wales in 2017 alone, a 24 per cent increase in the past five years.26There were 1.2 million people on the social housing waiting list in 2017, but less than 6,000 homes were built that year.”

The disappearing safety net
“The Special Rapporteur heard time and again about important public programmes being pared down, the loss of institutions that previously protected vulnerable people, social care services at a breaking point, and local government and devolved administrations stretched far too thin. Considering the significant resources available in the country and the sustained and widespread cuts to social support, which have resulted in significantly worse outcomes, the policies pursued since 2010 amount to retrogressive measures in clear violation of the country’s human rights obligations.”

Ideological, not economic
“The ideological rather than economic motivation for the cutbacks is demonstrated by the fact that the United Kingdom spends £78 billion per year to reduce or alleviate poverty, quite apart from the cost of benefits; £1 in every £5 spent on public services goes to repair what poverty has done to people’s lives.40Cuts to preventive services mean that needs go unmet and people in crisis are pushed toward services that cannot turn them away but cost far more, like emergency rooms and expensive temporary housing.”

Harm done by Universal Credit
“The Special Rapporteur heard countless stories of severe hardships suffered under UC. These reports are corroborated by an increasing body of research that suggests UC is being implemented in ways that negatively impact claimants’ mental health, finances and work prospects. Where UC has fully rolled out, food bank demand has increased, a link belatedly acknowledged by the Work and Pensions Secretary in February 2019.”

Sanctions regime
“One of the key features of UC involves the imposition of strict conditions enforced by draconian sanctions for even minor infringements. As the system grows older, some penalties will last years. The Special Rapporteur reviewed seemingly endless evidence illustrating the harsh and arbitrary nature of some sanctions, as well as the devastating effects of losing access to benefits for weeks or months at a time.”

Women and poverty
“Given the structural disadvantages faced by women, it is particularly disturbing that so many policy changes since 2010 have taken a greater toll on them. Changes to tax and benefit policies made since May 2010 will by 2021–2022 have reduced support for women far more than for men. Reductions in social care services translate to an increased burden on primary caregivers, who are disproportionately women. Under UC, single payments to an entire household, which are the default arrangement, can entrench problematic and often gendered interpersonal dynamics, including by giving control of payments to a financially or physically abusive partner.”

Scotland
“It is too soon to say whether these steps – and Scotland’s new powers of taxation – will make a difference for people in poverty. However, it is clear that there is still a real accountability gap which can and should be addressed. The Social Security (Scotland) Act of 2018 provides no redress for violations of the right to social security. But if the compelling recommendations made by the First Minister’s Advisory Group on Human Rights Leadership are adopted, and if the Scottish Government acts swiftly on its commitment to incorporate the principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child into Scottish law, these steps will make a huge difference.”

www.commonspace.scot/articles/14270/sanitised-version-nineteenth-century-workhouse-10-damning-conclusions-new-un-poverty

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 15:27:03

Whitewavemark2
Fact. If you want more housing then you need the infrastructure.
Fact. If you need houses and infrastructure then you have to have clear ground which often means parks, playing fields, fields and green spaces etc being built on.
Fact. Trees, hedges and (unprotected) wildlife habitats are, in many cases, razed to facilitate building. HS2 is an example on a wider scale.
Those are facts.
Very few brownfield sites are being utilised.

lemongrove Sat 25-May-19 15:32:05

Yes, I read about that GG54 and although good for tenants I can see that landlords who have had problems may want to get out of the renting game.
I don’t think anyone wants to see vast council estates being built again, but building small amounts in all villages and towns would be best ( for all concerned.)Social housing does have to be built now into all housing estates ( private estates)
And as there are so many now either built or half built, that’s a good start.Where I live there are no fewer than five private estates newly built, and when I drive locally, go past another four estates, with a large fifth one just starting.
This seems to be mirrored in many parts of the country, they are building very quickly now, the floodgates well and truly open.

GillT57 Sat 25-May-19 16:18:23

lemongrove at one time, developers had to provide a percentage of the homes they were building as social housing. These houses would then be handed over to the local authority or more likely, the local housing association. But, I think, Cameron and Osborne made changes and the help to buy system where you save a certain amount, get your deposit topped up, or part buy/part rent. was used to replace the provision of social housing. This may work in some areas, but if you are on a zero hours contract, or minimum wage, even if full time, it is nigh on impossible to get a mortgage for the 60%, let alone pay rent on the balance or save up the deposit in the first place.

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 16:20:09

I agree lemongrove
In my area (Waverley) there are several building programmes in place. I don't know whether it includes social housing but government is instructing councils to fulfil certain numbers in particular timescales. A nearby beauty spot has been earmarked for 200 properties after they demolish the current private estate (manse) but there are other builds in the pipeline.
If we keep concreting over green spaces, it's not good for the environment and increases the chance of flooding, besides, resting your eyes on a nice patch of green or seeing trees grow a mantle of leaves in Spring or walking through crisp Autumn foliage is calming and good for the soul. smile

Whitewavemark2 Sat 25-May-19 16:24:56

gg54 but that is not what you said was it?

What you DID say was more emotive and fact free. Whilst I am the first to argue for environmental protection, as you are aware the EU has done some sterling work in this area, I prefer to use facts rather than what is clearly opinion laden.

Too many people too little land? Incorrect opinion only
Tarmac all over green spaces, fields and gardens. Incorrect opinion only
Cut down all the trees? Incorrect opinion only
Decimate wildlife? Incorrect opinion only
Etc etc

You ended with the sentence

“Too many people on a tiny island. What was once a green and pleasant land
No longer

Dog whistle politics and fact free opinion.

GillT57 Sat 25-May-19 16:58:58

GG54 was their any singing at the meet? Jerusalem by any chance? Just to stir up all the little Englanders? Was their any merchandise for sale? T shirts or car stickers to announce your political views to all and sundry? Refreshments? Beer and fags a la Farage? No foreign food I bet. Sorry, I am really curious as I have never attended such an event and I am fascinated by the details of such a gathering of the faithful. Did he mention May? Or Boris?

GillT57 Sat 25-May-19 17:03:27

There, not their

GillT57 Sat 25-May-19 17:04:45

Blinking phone had changed there to their. I do know the difference.

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 17:09:12

GillT57
You should have come along, then I wouldn't have to give chapter and verse.
Next time? The costs are quite reasonable.

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 17:13:05

Whitewavemark2
The first few sentences were questions...y'know...???
Now...I'll let you get on with more important things than typing pesky comments to me.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 25-May-19 17:41:21

Yes you must be aware that I knew that as I put in your question mark when quoting you.

But nevertheless they were not as you subsequently claimed facts, but what it was, was dog whistle politics.

You are learning from the master of dog whistle politics - Farage.

He has used it so much over the past few years. Remember the poster he had copied from the Nazis when he stood in front of a line of people? It convinces many people who think very uncritically.

But people who use this tactic must always be called out. Hope not hate.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 25-May-19 17:44:10

Oh and by the way your post 13.18

“Each has it’s own back story”

Stray apostrophe there. tut !tut!

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 17:59:55

Whitewavemark2
Oh dear confused
I know nothing about dogs or whistling nor do I immerse myself in political jousting. I'm voting for Brexit regardless of whoever is at the helm with the exception of radicals, terrorists and rabble rousers.
The 'party' not the man. smile
Now...if you'll excuse me I'm expecting a phone call. grin

Whitewavemark2 Sat 25-May-19 18:06:11

There is no party only a company

Gonegirl Sat 25-May-19 18:32:13

W.T.F. What on earth is "Dog whistle politics"?

Please don't actually tell me. hmm

GabriellaG54 Sat 25-May-19 18:32:35

Whatever you say *Whitewavemark2
but I did put quotation marks and they usually signify that the author (in this case, grinme) doesn't agree with the word.

Gonegirl Sat 25-May-19 18:33:23

Where the flip did you get that from WWmk2?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 25-May-19 18:38:45

gonegirl google it.

Farage and many on the right are past masters of the art.

It is essential that you recognise it if you are followers of Farage and the far right or you may not recognise the sub-texts and be fooled by what they are saying.

lemongrove Sat 25-May-19 21:33:11

Gonegirl ? using ‘in’ jargon like dog whistle and strawman always make me laugh when reading them on GN
News and politics pages.The user possibly thinks it sounds rather cool.

lemongrove Sat 25-May-19 21:35:04

I was told by a local councillor that the nearby housing estates had a percentage of social housing, so think it’s still the case ( no mortgage required) but I can google it to make sure.

Drum1234 Sat 25-May-19 23:42:16

FYI, the term strawman dates from the 16th century. Not really 'in' jargon.

rosecarmel Sun 26-May-19 03:02:36

The problem with pavement is drainage - There's never enough of it and it floods as a result, which causes damage, which is costly, and all of it due to poor planning and urban sprawl-

Adding insult to injury are areas of urban decay just left standing, pot-holed roads, broken walkways, skeletons of homes and industrial buildings, where there was once a bustling community-

But none of it matters really because nobody can plan for what's to come weather wise with natural disasters on the rise- People will just use their default plan and continue to rebuild, again and again, in the very same vulnerable locations, pouring all those government funds basically down the drain to be swept out to the seas that will rush back in and ..

Oh, the bear went over the mountain, the bear went over the mountain ..

lemongrove Sun 26-May-19 08:43:33

The term ‘strawman’ may indeed be old, but it’s back in vogue where politics is concerned, you see it regularly now on social media and in newspapers etc.
I think people use it when they like to be thought of as one of the cognoscenti.