I would appreciate some help and clarity here. Please be gentle with me as bullying and smartypants causes me to disappear. I keep reading Mrs May 'inherited' a poison chalice. Did she not volunteer for it knowingly by being willing to stand as PM? Secondly, I have not read her 'good deal'. 560 pages I believe? I probably wouldn't understand half the political jargon anyway. I have only ever heard other than from Mrs May herself that this was an extremely bad deal for the country. Presumably the 'weaknesses' would have been pointed out and debated in the numerous cabinet meetings and in the House itself. Why did she believe her deal was good when there was so much specific opposition to the content detail of it? Did she not mind the Country having a bad deal? I certainly don't get that impression of her at all. I wish her well but hope she retires and doesn't become a backbencher. Never thought I'd hear myself saying this but.... I LONG for a general election. Whew!
Is democracy being by-passed in favour of the billionaires?


