The haves and have-nots have always existed. What's new???
Are we saying we should somehow cull the bright, rich, privileged and get them all wearing hoodies and using food banks?
Life is unfair, always has been, but communism (rounding people down to the lowest common denominators whilst those running the show get the privileges, via corruption, usually) is not the answer.
Is there an answer? Could it be that the rich just might have worked hard (and had no money behind them) and those who are homeless were thrown out because of their love of dossing and shooting up heroin?
Yes, extreme examples, but when on earth will those full of envy and scorn stop making assumptions which vilify the rich yet sympathise whole-heartedly with those who may have made no effort to improve their lot?
Extreme poverty is NOT the fault of those with wealth. I'd rather a Cambridge-educated person with insight and intelligence be in charge than a blinkered soap-box communist full of hatred impose his sort of 'justice' on the country.
And another thing - why are the educated and rich seemingly without sympathy?
The few I know are decent, kind people with a social conscience. Having money in the bank is not a sign of callous indifference.