Gransnet forums

News & politics

Why on earth are people doing this?

(96 Posts)
merlotgran Sat 06-Jul-19 11:23:15

They don't want you - just your money!

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7219165/Senior-royals-including-Charles-William-Kate-gather-Windsor-baby-Archies-christening.html

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:34:14

E.g. I know someonw who works with learning disabilities. Press would absolutely freak out their service users. A major royal visits semi regularly and supports them a lot.. no fuss..

Charles and Will do that kind of thing. Harry doesnt

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:32:59

The Windsor chapel is quite local to them. grin
Did you really want them to cross the road to the Baptist?

eazybee Sat 06-Jul-19 13:32:41

It would be lovely if the Press did not print any photographs of the Christening, (not a hope) then the Sussexes could achieve their desire to bring their child up as a private citizen. They could also bring him up on private money too.
This foolish behaviour will rebound on them, and diminishes the work most of the Royal Family do. Then who will pay for the £5,000 copper baths and more carpets to replace the new ones their ill-trained dogs muddied, according to last Sunday's 'What the Papers Say'? The Press is already snapping at their heels.
What a stupid pair.

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:32:07

Some quite major royals do very low profile charity work. But not harry, nor Di for that matter

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:28:47

I mean the royal duties they carry out.

Um hmm.... one wonders how much of a social conscience H would retain if nobody was watching and it wasnt accompanied with all the perks and praise?

I feel that W would still want to do good work if nobody was looking. As Charles does. They do it out of duty, not to make themselves look good

SirChenjin Sat 06-Jul-19 13:26:34

With their closest celebrity friends in attendance...

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:24:49

And it's NOT a "secret christening" as the Mail is making out. We wouldn't know about it if it was.

That is exactly the point!

They could have a private life!
They dont want one. They want a royal profile and royal events!

They could have had a private chapel christening and nobody would know or care!

They chose to have a Wibdsor christening with disingenuous shyness and coyness..

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:23:30

I mean the royal duties they carry out.

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:23:05

I was hoping William and Kate hadn't gone to the wrong place notanan. grin

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:22:29

If they were in a "big gated community in LA right now", he wouldn't be able to do all the work he does. Neither would she when her maternity leave is over.

They could work plenty, on their own terms. But they would have to be self sufficient!

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:22:23

And it's NOT a "secret christening" as the Mail is making out. We wouldn't know about it if it was.

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:20:51

Westminster? It's Windsor isn't it? confused

Sorry grin yeah thats what I meant lol

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:20:20

If they were in a "big gated community in LA right now", he wouldn't be able to do all the work he does. Neither would she when her maternity leave is over.

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:20:10

"We're not telling you!!" is classic childish (Di style) attention seeking tactics.

If they hadnt made a point of not telling who the god parents are, not many people would care....

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:18:52

Westminster? It's Windsor isn't it? confused

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:18:11

Only joking!!!

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:17:58

Of course, the baby could have a big birthmark on his chin and they want to keep that under wraps.

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:17:27

I can totally understand why Harry wants privacy for his son.

He doesn't though!
He wants a westminster christening, all the royal perks..

They could be in a big gated comminity in La right now, they are rich enough to buy privacy!

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:16:51

I don't think you can buy people's private lives!

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:15:12

He could have lived with her stateside if he had abdicated . Plenty of minor aristocrats do. He could have made a fortune from personal appearances and kept them quite well. Chosing when to do appearances and chosing when to shun it. She could have continued her career....

But they came back here to live a royal life... so playing the coy "why cant I have privacy" Di card is just not going to wash

GrannyGravy13 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:13:29

Archie hasn't been given a "Royal Title", he is down the line of succession.

I can totally understand why Harry wants privacy for his son.

Suerussell Sat 06-Jul-19 13:13:20

I think Harry and Megan have had a right old pasting in the press and of course her father and his relations haven’t helped matters.

Therefore I think this is going to be the response to that going forward. I don’t blame them to be honest. The press coverage has been brutal.

Also I think an unsaid thing is that the press are wanting to see the colour of the baby’s skin. Absolute nightmare for them, they probably don’t want their baby gawked at for that reason.

Same thing about keeping the names of the Godparents secret. They would be hounded by the press too.

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:12:34

And yes. Sunglasses because it's sunny. hmm

Gonegirl Sat 06-Jul-19 13:11:46

I don't understand the furore. It's a christening. What is there to see? Is it because Kate wheeled one of hers to the church in that big pram? confused Each to his/her own I reckon. I can live without pictures.

notanan2 Sat 06-Jul-19 13:09:34

Thats fine... until they want to claim the benefits of the "rules"..

... in which case they should be told you're either all in or all out