Better check the rumours floating around. Can't say more due to superinjunction in place. Allegedly. It'll all come out soon enough I suspect.
Good Morning Saturday 9th May 2026
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
I was going to post this on the BBC bias thread but thought it might get losts in other aspects of the discussion.
Then I thought I would post it on the old Meanwhile in Scotland thread, but was advised by GN HQ that as that was over a year old I would be better to start a new thread - Hence MIS2.
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/majority-of-scots-back-independence-as-no-deal-brexit-looms-ashcroft-poll-shows-nctw5zkqv?fbclid=IwAR3TeBkwuszIoLZfNKkI25NNOv9SvxMC
Recent polls have shown an almost 50/50 split on Scottish Independence. This poll, conducted by of all people the Conservative Lord Ashcroft is the first in recent times to show a YES vote in the lead.
I wanted to post it for two reasons
1) because the BBC did not mention it any any of their news bulletins even the BBC Scotland ones (bias?)
2) because the comments following the report in The Times show a woeful lack of knowledge of the finances and assets of Scotland and are repeating the old 'Spain would block them', 'they would be bankrupt', WE (who is We?) would not let them use the pound' etc.etc. There are comments suggesting that the money saved by not paying the Scottish Block Grant could mean a boost of billions for the NHS in England/Wales completely ignoring that the loss of all tax and revenue from Scotland would wipe 10%ish (perhaps more if you consider oil and gas licences and revenues) from the RUK budget at a stroke. Nor do they realise that an Independent Scotland within the EU would not suffer from the loss of exports to England when they have tariff free access to the vast market of the EU.
Is this a representative view of (presumably educated) Times readers? Or are they as ignorant as the average Daily Mail poster?
Better check the rumours floating around. Can't say more due to superinjunction in place. Allegedly. It'll all come out soon enough I suspect.
Here is another good news story from NewsNet
newsnet.scot/news-analysis/nicola-sturgeon-to-receive-major-european-award/?fbclid=IwAR1p_alTGkuiDgerW_EecLqaxeta2obr0-TOJhyV4HU7BY4KMAWoxkLc-Ck
FORMER finance secretary Derek Mackay will not face charges over the barrage of "inappropriate" messages he sent to a 16-year-old boy. Police Scotland consulted with the Crown Office before concluding that no laws had been broken in his interactions with the teen, according to a report in the Daily Record.“The messages were not highly sexualised and, in any case, the boy was 16 and of age. But consideration was given as to whether the messages could have caused fear and alarm or distress. The teen claims he had not been troubled enough by the messages to make a formal complaint to the police, though they had made him feel uncomfortable.
Also nothing on the mainstream news about Nicola's trip to Brussels to make a speech, updating the EU on Scotland's current position and to have cordial talks with Barnier.
If you only source news via the Unionist press and BBC, then you will only see 'SNP' bad stories e.g. that Nicola is personally responsible for the freak weather conditions which led to a temporary closure of the Queensferry crossing to ensure the safety of travellers.
It’s been a busy week in Scotland. The Finance Minister has had to resign in unfortunate circumstances. I guess he won’t be taking over as SNP leader now. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-51397956
The CalMac Ferries affair rumbles on. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-50866891?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scotland/scotland_politics&link_location=live-reporting-story
Twice as many homeless people dying as elsewhere. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-51384196?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scotland/scotland_politics&link_location=live-reporting-story
John Swinney has been forced to widen the review into education. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-51392631?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scotland/scotland_politics&link_location=live-reporting-story
There’s a two year delay on Aberdeen’s new family hospital. www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/news/local/two-year-delay-for-aberdeen-hospital-plan/
In other news, Scotland is as beautiful as ever. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-51392640
The Bill concerned funding for the NHS. Under the Barnett Formula the Scottish Government which controls the Scottish NHS, receives a set percentage of the allocation to the NHS in England. Thus the decision taken under EVEL does directly affect the funding for the Scottish NHS.
You’ll need to enlighten me - I was working for NHSS today and didn’t realise there had been a vote on something that was going to affect us directly, unless you’re talking about the SNP attempting to vote on an English matter?
I take it all you unionists are happy that the Scottish MP's were denied a vote on bill that clearly affects the SNHS? Is this democracy? Persoanlly I was spitting feathers mbut then I believe that we should be treated fairly and time after time I find westminster lets me down.
Thank you, Granny23. Very moving and cheering at the same time.
Thank you Grannyn23, I did watch and wept.
Apologies - it was only the last poll that was funded by Scot Goes Pop
You don’t need to assume anything - that’s exactly what happens. Mackay is advised by a range of experts from a variety of fields who make assessments and report to him. Remember that Murphy is only one Indy supporting expert in a very wide field - other financial opinions are available.
The last two polls were commissioned and funded by pro Indy groups (with one crowdfunded) so I’d urge caution at this point - they’re certainly not going to convince the fence sitters like me to vote Yes. I don’t doubt that there’s an appetite given the shambles at WM but we all know how bitter and divisive the last few years have been. Until the SNP offer Scotland something that’s quite obviously better then it’s a wait and see game as the vast majority of political commentators have already said.
Murphy's recent critique of GERS, with embedded links to earlier blogs.
www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2019/12/30/its-time-for-gers-to-go/
I note that Mackay appears to have no formal qualifications in accounting, economics or data handling. I assume he relies on his advisors to brief him on financial matters. Not a criticism in particular but I'd take an expert's word over a minister's.
"THE future of the UK may be on a knife edge as a new poll places support for Scottish independence at 52% - its highest for over three-and-a-half years. The Panelbase poll puts Yes support at 52% - up five percentage points from a previous study."
That's 3 polls within a week giving support for Independence at 50, 51, and 52%. I'm not saying that is conclusive but it certainly gives the lie to the UK Governments claim that there is NO appetite for it in Scotland.
That’s not how a deficit works paddyanne as you well know . You can read more about it here - including Mackay’s acknowledgment that the Gers data, which covers all UK and Scottish government spending in Scotland and a share of pan-UK spending on areas such as defence, overseas aid and debt reduction, was an accurate assessment of the country’s fiscal position last year. www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/21/scotland-2018-deficit-higher-than-uk-as-a-whole-last-year
WE dont have a deficit ,we have aproportion of Westminsters debts put in our name.Thats things we neither want nor need and wouldn't spend billions of our own money on.Like London crossrail and London Sewers and Big Ben ,Buck house .HS2 and the one a majority of Scots want rid of Trident.
We can well afford to run our country IF we get control of our finances .Currently westmonster keeps 60% of our income and thats not counting the exports that go out through English ports.They're counted as English.Whisky alone accounts for around 25% of ALL UK food and drink exports
Does anyone really believe thats the right way a country should be run.
By a parliament that has 80% of its members who dont live or work here and who know damn all about Scotland and care even less.Its not the norm .Over 60 Nations have gained Independence from Westminster in past decades .How many asked to come back...that'll be none!!
Not at Maizie - he is a well known supporter of Scottish independence, he doesn’t just make a case for it. I don’t dismiss him, he’s entitled to his nationalist leaning views, but there are plenty with non nationalist leanings who dispute his financial appraisals.
Aspen there’s a good interview here with Gavin McCrone about the McCrone report (which never actually existed as a report) www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/brian-wilson-here-s-the-real-story-about-the-mccrone-report-1-4886216/amp and another here www.heraldscotland.com/news/17462813.mccrone-reacts-as-famous-scottish-independence-oil-report-published-in-newspaper/
Murphy supports Scottish independence, but how does that make him a nationalist, SirChenjin? I'd support it but I don't live there and I'm, if anything, English. Does that make me a nationalist too?
He's an academic who is putting the case for Scottish independence; I thought you were rather dismissive of him because of what you think he is, rather than what he actually says.
Recommend a little background reading "McCrone Report" on Scottish Oil
Look up "Stolen Seas" on UTube.
Thatcher scooped up all the Oil and now Boris has his eye on something far more precious, Scottish Water. So far it has been too expensive to pump down to England but the day will come when the economics make it worthwhile. That is if he doesn't manage to sell it off like English Supplies.
First quote marks should have been before "Richard Murphy is an economist...
Yes, really 
He's a well known supporter of indy Richard Murphy is an economist.
"He runs the blog Tax Research UK where he is described as:
Richard Murphy (60) is a chartered accountant and a political economist. He has been described by the Guardian newspaper as an “anti-poverty campaigner and tax expert”. He is Professor of Practice in International Political Economy at City University, London and Director of Tax Research UK. According to International Tax Review Richard was the 7th most influential person in global tax in 2013. In 2016 Richard was in the same journal’s Global Top 50 in tax, one of only two people to have been so for the whole five years it had published such a list. In 2017 he was ninth on the same list.
And he’s a supporter of Scottish Independence. Here are a couple of videos where he talks about how Scotland will do economically as an independent nation"
as suggested by the well known nationalist, Mr Murphy.
Really, SirChenjin? 
He's not even Scottish (surname is a bit of a clue) and he lives in the south of England. He has no skin in the game. Neither do I (apart from having a niece and nephew born in Scotland of English parents - who support Independence). I just put the link here for the interest of those involved.
Murphy has done the calculations; casts doubts on the GERs figures, and contends that Scotland could well 'go it alone'.
Thanks MaizieD for answering my question. I daresay legal fees could mount on it!
To be fair to the OP, she called the DM posters ignorant not its readers 
I’m a Daily Mail reader. Thank you for calling me ignorant.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.