Bradford I’m sure there are some reprehensible Knights etc and some very fine ones. But anyway it’s not his domestic life he has to account for as in he didn’t do the washing up but that he was found guilty of physically assaulting another human being. The so-called minimising of this by calling it a ‘domestic’ just shows how far there is still to go in taking this category of violence seriously. His language and dismissive obnoxious responses today to his critics show exactly what a boorish thug he is. He was also a great supporter of apartheid South Africa. As for his conviction being ‘spent’ that’s meaningless in this context and anyway, even if a conviction is normally spent under the Act it doesn’t not mean it does not have to be disclosed in specific situations.
But the whole situation is just a particularly glaring example of the nonsense that is the honours system
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
