Apart from criticising the Fire Brigade for not changing its instructions, the report also makes the following points:
"Changes to the walls of the tower made during the refurbishment meant it was in breach of Regulation B(4), which requires the external walls of a building to “adequately resist the spread of flame”.
The aluminium composite material (ACM) cladding panels was the “primary cause” of fire spread up the tower, adding that it was “more likely than not” that the plastic insulation also contributed.
An ‘architectural crown’, also made of ACM, at the top of the tower was the cause of the most rapid horizontal fire spread
Flaws in the design of the kitchen window in Flat 16 allowed an “ordinary” and “perfectly foreseeable” kitchen fire to escape the room and ignite the cladding.
The building suffered a “total failure of compartmentation”, with missing self-closers on fire doors a crucial contributing factor."
Although the question of compartmentalisation is to be a major focus in the second report, it would appear that if the building had been designed and maintained properly, the damage from the fire would have been minimised. The advice to "stay put" would have been the correct one.
Rees-Mogg has encouraged people to ignore official advice in the future (which in most cases will be the correct advice), which could possibly cause unnecessary deaths.
By framing his comments as he did - and even worse, for Andrew Bridgen to support him as "clever" - he has certainly given the impression that the victims of Grenfell Tower had no common sense.
Why didn't he mention any of the other points in the report? Criticising the fire brigade for giving the wrong advice and the victims for having no common sense seems like a diversionary tactic.