Whitewavemark2, in regard to your post @10:59 today, you state we are where we are in regard to the stance and status of the party, and in the main, I agree with that statement.
However, how the Labour Party arrived at where it is now is highly important for if, as is being alleged, a right-wing element within the PLP worked directly against a person who was elected twice as leader with the largest majority ever obtained in a leadership election, then that cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged.
For if the above were to go unchallenged the Parliamentary Labour Party no longer can be a broad-based democratic organisation but has become a one stance political organisation in the hands of an unelected few.
It is for now for those in the highest prominence within the PLP to decide its future. Do they wish to see true democracy maintained, or do they wish to see only a right-wing stance maintained with sometimes illegal action by unelected employees and officials being allowed to take place to maintain that stance?
The overall Labour movement in the country is based on totally democratic principles and if the Parliamentary Labour Party wishes to remain part of that, then it must demonstrate to all others within the movement that it is also fully democratic and any who act against that core principle will be brought to book.
Stamer had already worked against the above principle in not suspending from their employment all those who it is alleged carried out action against their own elected leader while the investigation is carried out.