Elegran I don't think you understand that that just isn't relevant, it's not relevant because it's not related. It's not relevant and it doesn't upset people. It's an extraordinary leap and it's an uncomfortable one for some reading it.
A lady wanted to buy a bra that matches her skin tone, she didn't like it was called "tobacco" and she felt that was a negative name choice for a colour compared to other bras with positive name choices.
I wouldn't want to buy a bra called "tobacco", it's the same as I wouldn't want to buy a bra named "vomit yellow". But that is not the actual point here.
The point is that, someone gave an item that matches skin tone a negative name. If it was a sofa, no one would buy it to match skin tone but many would be put off by the name. Foundation would also be problematic called tobacco... Its bad marketing... Its a poor choice that you would have to wonder why, the person naming it, for women who often like pretty things, would make it