Gransnet forums

News & politics

... and the sleaze goes on ...

(136 Posts)
PippaZ Tue 20-Apr-21 12:55:57

This is the latest email from The Good Law Project

We already knew that Boris Johnson had misled Parliament when he insisted in February 2021 that all COVID contracts were now “on the record”. Now we’ve uncovered a new contract that makes further nonsense of that claim.

In July 2020 Pharmaceuticals Direct Limited was handed a £102.6 million Government PPE contract - without any competition. Though it was awarded the multi-million pound deal to supply face masks last July, Government failed to publish any details relating to the contract until March this year. In fact, it was only after our lawyers wrote to Government about Pharmaceuticals Direct that this lucrative contract was disclosed, long after Boris Johnson claimed all contract details were on the record. The company’s named representative was a man named Samir Jassal.

Samir Jassal is a well-connected figure within the Conservative Party. A two-time Conservative Party parliamentary candidate and former councillor, he has met Boris Johnson on at least three occasions, with the last meeting held in October 2020. According to his LinkedIn profile, he was an adviser in No.10 during David Cameron’s premiership in 2015 and has worked with several other prominent Conservative Party figures, including the Home Secretary Priti Patel and Minister Zac Goldsmith. Jassal has also donated £4,000 to the Conservative Party in recent years.

This £102.6 million contract is not the only one handed to Pharmaceuticals Direct by the Department for Health and Social Care - the firm received an earlier PPE contract in May 2020, worth £28.8 million. Both deals were directly awarded to the firm without any competition.

The High Court has already ruled that Government acted unlawfully by failing to publish details of Covid-related contracts. The appearance of bias in some of these lucrative contracts awarded without competition is cause for even greater concern.

The more details that we uncover on PPE contracts, the more serious the questions that arise. In this case Government's apparent amnesia when it comes to its legal obligations has prevented timely public scrutiny of a multi-million pound direct award to a Tory party member and donor.

We intend to get answers. To hold Government to account and protect public funds, we have sent a pre-action protocol letter initiating legal proceedings.

MayBee70 Tue 04-May-21 23:49:51

What’s all this about Jo Johnson being a director at Dyson?

Eloethan Mon 03-May-21 20:27:09

I think you're spot on there whitewave.

varian Mon 03-May-21 17:44:12

Whereas ordinary folk have children, love them and take care of them, BJ has so many children he can't count them and wants Tory donors or taxpayers to take care of his latest child.

NotSpaghetti Mon 03-May-21 16:06:42

Nandalot I only discovered this about the nanny yesterday. It seems extraordinary to me.

Whilst some employers do have childcare perks, the idea that you can just expect someone else to stump up is mind boggling.

Parsley3 Mon 03-May-21 10:21:40

WWM2 That is what I am thinking and Mercurio is no fan of the PM.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 03-May-21 07:45:30

Line of Duty caught their man - as Hastings said it was

Corruption masquerading as blundering

Whitewavemark2 Mon 03-May-21 07:33:52

“The story about Johnson soliciting donations for domestic help illustrates the key problem: not only that he insists on living beyond his means but that what we know about is just the tip of the iceberg. The PM has no scruples and we have no idea who or how much he owes”.

Lis

Nandalot Sun 02-May-21 13:44:05

The Good Law Project has revealed names of more companies who have benefitted from PPE contracts.
goodlawproject.org/update/awarded-contracts-vip-lane/
One of them was insolvent and has no employees!
The article makes very shocking reading.

Nandalot Sun 02-May-21 09:48:58

So Johnson allegedly asked Tory donors to pay for his personal trainer and his nanny!
www.independent.co.uk/donations?itm_channel=display&itm_campaign=donations-uk-boris&itm_date=1220-0121&itm_content=970x250_skin
Also reported in Sunday Mail.
Well, he always said he would be hard put to survive on the PM salary of £150,000.

stewaris Fri 30-Apr-21 20:13:53

Unfortunately, like Scotland, Westminster doesn't have a really good opposition party. I think Labour have lost their way for quite some time now and I'm not sure Keir Starmer is the man to bring them back.

Kali2 Fri 30-Apr-21 20:04:13

NotSpaghetti

I think calling it “sleeze ” minimises the extent of the problem.
It brushes over what is basically corruption, lies, fraud, cronyism...
Just calling it “sleeze” sounds as though some of it is really petty - or even made-up.
It is not.

Totally agree. IT IS NOT

varian Fri 30-Apr-21 18:56:27

Criminality caused by greed and an unwarranted sense of entitlement.

"Rules only apply to the little people - not people like us"

"Isn't it just brilliant that the little people keep voting for us?"

NotSpaghetti Fri 30-Apr-21 11:23:46

I think calling it “sleeze ” minimises the extent of the problem.
It brushes over what is basically corruption, lies, fraud, cronyism...
Just calling it “sleeze” sounds as though some of it is really petty - or even made-up.
It is not.

varian Thu 29-Apr-21 13:48:21

A new report has revealed that £2.1billion worth of COVID contracts were handed to companies politically connected to the Conservative Party.

Many of these will have benefited from access to a 'VIP lane', knowledge of which appeared to be "confined to only those within the party of government in Westminster".

Unlock Democracy is supporting calls for a fully independent inquiry and today we are launching a new action targeting tainted donations.

We're writing to the Conservative Party Treasurer asking him to hand over donations received from individuals and companies that benefited unfairly from COVID contracts.

We believe the money should go to the NHS.

secure.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/page/81458/petition/1?ea.tracking.id=email&ea.url.id=5281041

varian Thu 29-Apr-21 13:36:32

Yes. Eddie Mair was standing in for Andrew Marr on his Sunday morning show and was possibly more direct in his questioning than AM might have been .

Perhaps that may be one of the reasons that Eddie Mair no longer works for the Brexit Broadcasting Corporation.

Whitewavemark2 Thu 29-Apr-21 12:29:54

varian

Eddie Mair interviewed Boris Johnson before he became PM and challenged him on his past behaviour including offering to give the address of someone he wanted "duffed up"". For once the waffling and bumbling act did not work. Eddie Mair told him that the truth was that he was "a nasfy piece of work".

He was right, wasn't he?

Was that where Johnson tried to get another journalist beaten up?

Whitewavemark2 Thu 29-Apr-21 12:29:10

A group of Doctors are in court this morning bring a case against the government and the dodgy PPE contracts.

Hope they get somewhere.

varian Thu 29-Apr-21 10:27:13

Eddie Mair interviewed Boris Johnson before he became PM and challenged him on his past behaviour including offering to give the address of someone he wanted "duffed up"". For once the waffling and bumbling act did not work. Eddie Mair told him that the truth was that he was "a nasfy piece of work".

He was right, wasn't he?

PippaZ Thu 29-Apr-21 10:18:50

Going back to yesterday and PMQs I do have to say I think Johnson showed just how he looks in a temper. Keir Starmer had done his usual forensic questioning for Johnson to reply "The right honourable and learned gentleman is a lawyer, I am given to understand.”

When you start such mean-minded, playground comments, that insult one of the countries highly thought of QCs and, by implication, insult the office of state that he held you are clearly out of your depth.

This being the case he should surely just come clean.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 28-Apr-21 19:24:20

Thank you Dinahmo I knew you would know

varian Wed 28-Apr-21 18:41:18

I seem to remember that when Dyson relocated his company HQ to Singapore, and was accused of doing it for tax reasons, he said that there would only be two of his staff moving there so tax had nothing to do with it. Really?

Dinahmo Wed 28-Apr-21 18:17:32

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark1 I think we need Dinahmo who has more Company knowledge than I have.

I would have thought that however the Company is structured if it is registered in the UK that Accounts in some form would have to be submitted annually?

It's an unlimited liability company which means it's not required to file accounts at Companies House. It's rare because the vast majority of people setting companies require the protection of limited liability. So if you set up a company with £100 share capital, that is the limit of the shareholders' liability.

Nandalot Wed 28-Apr-21 15:35:00

markdsikes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/3400-33.jpg
Just to see the sort of items Johnson is spending his? money on, this is allegedly the table purchased for £3000. Also wallpaper at £840 a roll.

Whitewavemark2 Wed 28-Apr-21 15:08:11

Once Johnson has made his WhatsApp and text messages available we can begin to piece together the truth.

GrannyGravy13 Wed 28-Apr-21 14:54:19

Mr. Dysons version of events.