Alegrias1
Yes, yes you are.
Read the whole thread and see where the weight of the argument lies, and see how many people have randomly thrown in comments like "people first" and see how they have been rebutted.
I have been reading the thread and chose not to comment until now. If the decision had to be made by those on the ground in a hurry, and if an enquiry finds there was space that wouldn't and couldn't be filled by people, then they had a very difficult choice to make. An enquiry will no doubt give us the facts rather than the scuttlebutt. I don't see how this would have felt okay for those left behind. I am posting my views, not yours, Alegrais.
I do not feel they ever stood much of a chance in getting everyone out. I was involved in evacuation rehearsals in an area under our control. The British, particularly forces families, tend to be compliant under normal circumstances. They are not so compliant when they are frightened.
Afghanistan was a retreat, and was a far more legistically difficult situation than the one I was involve in. It was bound, in some ways, to fail. I was lucky enough to come home early. However, I do know that it is likely to be some time before we know the truth of this situation.
I do not think putting the animals on the plane was a kindness to the people left behind. People, some of whom know being left behind is a death sentence. I think it was a bad call and decided to say so - without asking your permission to do so Alegrais.