PippaZ
LondonMzFitz
PippaZ, personally I don't mind if you don't or can't see the arguments put here, I think the facts of the case for both sides have been presented and debated. But will you allow that it's never been a case of animals before people?
I don't know how many times I haveto say I have read and understood your arguments. However, I disagree with the premise you are trying to force on others. I do not think we should have even attempted to bring out these animals while people were unable to leave. What greater insult you can make to a Muslim than suggest an animal is of more importance than they are? Whether or not that is the case, that is how it will appear.
I appreciate that you cannot or will not see that I don't look at this the way you do. You seem to be entirely ignorant of other people's views on this - unless they are political. Therefore you insist on politicising my views. But they are nothing to do with politics. The animals, as far as I am concerned, should have been left where they were.
Gosh, I certainly didn't mean to come across as you seem to be suggesting. I've got my cool and collected head on today (ranty head was firmly fixed until Pen got out of Afghanistan) when it was taken off (Worzel Gummidge style) and tucked away until next needed. Honestly and without sarcasm, I'm disappointed you seem to feel you are being needled by my comments.
I don't believe I'm being ignorant of other people's views; I will admit to being hugely irritated by the poster that only partly read an article, then misquoted it, and said she despised Pen. And those who have come on to parrot the nameless (gutless) government sources from the last week in what I firmly believe to be a concerted attack from one particular demographic (dipping toe in politics) against Pen.
But I'm happy to disagree (and again no sarcasm from me), The animals, as far as I am concerned, should have been left where they were unless they could have been taken to the UK where they can be rehomed.