Gransnet forums

News & politics

Johnson's attempts to limit our democratic freedoms

(150 Posts)
Dinahmo Sat 02-Oct-21 00:08:35

Who remembers the supreme court voting 11-0 against Johnson's unlawful suspension of parliament back in 2019? I do. It actually brought tears to my eyes listening to Lady Hale's speech (she of the spider brooch). Johnson wants to reform judicial review.

Who remembers the £1 billion fund set up in order to help struggling towns? 39 of the 45 towns selected are in Tory constituencies, some of them being adjacent to poorer towns. Could the reason be to make the sitting MP popular so that he or she will keep their seat at the next election?

Our Parliament grew from the assemblies created in the Middle Ages that then became councils that were called by kings for the purpose of redressing grievances and for exercising judicial functions. In time, Parliament began to deal with important matters of state, notably the raising of revenues needed to support the policies and decisions of the monarch. As its judicial functions were increasingly delegated to courts, it gradually evolved into a legislative body. By the end of the 15th century, the English system displayed some of the basic features of modern parliamentary government.

Our ancestors fought a war and executed a king because of the conflict between king and parliament. Our democracy has developed over the centuries since then. One of the reasons for Brexit was taking back control of our country (whatever that meant). It now seems as though Johnson is trying to limit the democratic controls as currently exercised and he could well succeed given the venality of some of the current govt.

The following is a link to the article in the Guardian by Jonathan Freedland which prompted me to write the above. I was aware of the proposed actions as I'm sure many of you are too. To those of you who don't read the Guardian, please have a quick look at the article.

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/01/boris-johnson-rigging-the-system-power-courts-protest-elections

frenchie Sat 02-Oct-21 17:42:57

This thread just shows how Tory members and brexiters NEVER answer a question!
Just like Boris Johnson at PMQ
It’s either because they have something to hide or they haven’t got any answers

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:40:19

OK, that's acceptable criticism. See the difference?

Although there's a wee slip into Campbell-berating there, lemongrove, but we'll let it go, seeing as you're trying.

lemongrove Sat 02-Oct-21 17:38:11

Yes, of course he is wrong!
We are not a ‘corrupt little country’ ( hasn’t Campbell ever travelled?) Nor is our media any worse than any other.
As for big donors being honoured....that has happened regularly in all political parties.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:33:01

Alegrias1

GrannyGravy13

I am beginning to realise that the only MP’s, ex SPADS or political commentators of right of centre politics are allowed to be criticised on GN.

Alistair Campbell is not now nor has he ever concerned himself about anything/anyone else other than Alistair Campbell

Ah, but is he wrong?

He may be a self important idiot with a penchant for playing the pipes, but is he wrong?

?

lemongrove Sat 02-Oct-21 17:31:38

GG13 wink

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:31:14

GrannyGravy13

I am beginning to realise that the only MP’s, ex SPADS or political commentators of right of centre politics are allowed to be criticised on GN.

Alistair Campbell is not now nor has he ever concerned himself about anything/anyone else other than Alistair Campbell

Ah, but is he wrong?

He may be a self important idiot with a penchant for playing the pipes, but is he wrong?

GrannyGravy13 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:28:37

I am beginning to realise that the only MP’s, ex SPADS or political commentators of right of centre politics are allowed to be criticised on GN.

Alistair Campbell is not now nor has he ever concerned himself about anything/anyone else other than Alistair Campbell

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:22:21

I can’t believe that Campbell is being held up as some sort of Holier than thou philosopher

Can you point out where that happened please?

As opposed to somebody quoting a tweet of his that happens to be true, which then triggers a set of rather unedifying posts attacking him? Such as you might find in, say, a dictatorship that wanted to silence dissenting voices.

Thank you smile

lemongrove Sat 02-Oct-21 17:07:54

I can’t believe that Campbell is being held up as some sort of
Holier than thou philosopher?
GG13 the first mention of Nazi Germany/Hitler on here was the signal for me to not take anything seriously, it’s always done as a last resort, but this time came early on.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 02-Oct-21 17:00:39

I haven’t got a problem with the Honours system per se. Cash for Honours should be illegal.

Alistair Campbell is a has been reduced to a couple of stand-in presenter slots on GMB, just trying to keep himself in the Public Eye.

growstuff Sat 02-Oct-21 16:47:20

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL
@campbellclaret
Evidence of the corrupt little country Johnson has created that a banker is made peer and minister after six-figure donation to the Tory Party and it is not even on the news, barely figures in the press. Johnson survives by having a media virtually as morally bankrupt as he is

Alistair Campbell should know all about being morally bankrupt after all it’s a good description of himself and the PM he worked for/covered up after.

Oh attacking the messenger is always a good ploy.

I am not attacking the messenger merely pointing out the blatantly obvious.

I am not a fan of Mr.Johnson or his Government however, posting tweets from Mr.Campbell trying to take the moral high ground I find hilarious.

Whatever you think of Alastair Campbell, what he says is true.

Where's the outrage about "cash for honours"?

MaizieD Sat 02-Oct-21 16:41:28

What are you accusing Campbell of in this instance, then GG13?

Do you think he's lying about cash for honours?

And what do you think of Freedland's article? Do you have any observations that might throw a different light on Johnson's actions?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 02-Oct-21 16:40:14

Exactly! attacking the messenger.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 02-Oct-21 16:38:53

Whitewavemark2

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL
@campbellclaret
Evidence of the corrupt little country Johnson has created that a banker is made peer and minister after six-figure donation to the Tory Party and it is not even on the news, barely figures in the press. Johnson survives by having a media virtually as morally bankrupt as he is

Alistair Campbell should know all about being morally bankrupt after all it’s a good description of himself and the PM he worked for/covered up after.

Oh attacking the messenger is always a good ploy.

I am not attacking the messenger merely pointing out the blatantly obvious.

I am not a fan of Mr.Johnson or his Government however, posting tweets from Mr.Campbell trying to take the moral high ground I find hilarious.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 02-Oct-21 16:34:21

GrannyGravy13

Whitewavemark2

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL
@campbellclaret
Evidence of the corrupt little country Johnson has created that a banker is made peer and minister after six-figure donation to the Tory Party and it is not even on the news, barely figures in the press. Johnson survives by having a media virtually as morally bankrupt as he is

Alistair Campbell should know all about being morally bankrupt after all it’s a good description of himself and the PM he worked for/covered up after.

Oh attacking the messenger is always a good ploy.

GrannyGravy13 Sat 02-Oct-21 16:23:39

Whitewavemark2

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL
@campbellclaret
Evidence of the corrupt little country Johnson has created that a banker is made peer and minister after six-figure donation to the Tory Party and it is not even on the news, barely figures in the press. Johnson survives by having a media virtually as morally bankrupt as he is

Alistair Campbell should know all about being morally bankrupt after all it’s a good description of himself and the PM he worked for/covered up after.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 02-Oct-21 16:15:48

ALASTAIR CAMPBELL
@campbellclaret
Evidence of the corrupt little country Johnson has created that a banker is made peer and minister after six-figure donation to the Tory Party and it is not even on the news, barely figures in the press. Johnson survives by having a media virtually as morally bankrupt as he is

frenchie Sat 02-Oct-21 16:14:07

I read Jonathan Freedland’s article first thing this morning. We are travelling to the UK today so had plenty of time to reflect about what was written.
We think that the UK has sinked to a new low. And what we wonder is who is really behind all this. Boris Johnson is just a puppet. He was chosen for his personae which appeals to a certain type of people who can’t see through it.
It’s a very sad and worrying time.

Smileless2012 Sat 02-Oct-21 15:37:52

Yes I am on the right thread growstuff are you?

Your post @ 14.15 responding to a post of mine which you re posted reads "How can you justify the actions which have been taken to limit freedoms".

growstuff Sat 02-Oct-21 15:34:15

Alegrias1

Just read the thread again.

Nobody compared Johnson to Putin, Stalin or Franco. Except those who think that would be a clever way of undermining sensible arguments.

And the poster who thought the we'd see Stalin-like dictatorships when the wokey wokes get elected.

confused

I think the poster was multi-tasking and thought she was addressing a toddler. (Maybe she's babysitting.)

growstuff Sat 02-Oct-21 15:32:45

More like the Theatre of the Absurd hmm.

growstuff Sat 02-Oct-21 15:32:01

Smileless Where did I make any assumptions about you or claim you justified Johnson's actions? Are you sure you're on the correct thread?

Alegrias1 Sat 02-Oct-21 15:25:12

25Avalon

Reductio ad absurdam Smileless

Boris - is that you?

grin

25Avalon Sat 02-Oct-21 15:05:10

Reductio ad absurdam Smileless

Smileless2012 Sat 02-Oct-21 14:43:49

I am not evading the issue growstuff and where exactly have I justified any of BJ's actions on this thread? You're simply making assumptions and what are you basing them on?

Why shouldn't I contribute to this thread to express my opinion, not on the thread per se but on a particular post?

As it happens MaizieD I am not in total disagreement with some of the views already expressed but don't agree with the way some are expressed for example "How long before Johnson arrests and executes his opponents to secure a dictatorship just as Hitler did".

Really 25Avalon!!