Alegrias1
Right, there's this.
The report from yesterday is an internal parliamentary report from two internal parliamentary bodies. Johnson et al have consistently avoided any commitment to an independent Public Enquiry.
In Scotland, we're going to have an independent Public Enquiry before the end of this year. Independent. So you won't have to wait too long for a proper enquiry GG13, certainly not as long as you'll have to in England. And given that about 50% of the members of the committees who complied the latest report are actually Conservative, we'll all be waiting to see what an independent inquiry says. This'll look quite friendly in comparison, I think.
I expect the independent Scottish enquiry will highlight the issues in the Scottish response, primarily returning people to care homes, I suspect. Or perhaps they'll say the same as the commentator on the report on radio yesterday, who said that Scotland's response had been better than the general UK one all the way down the line, but they were hobbled and restrained by the UK-wide rules.
Deflection, indeed.
It really isn’t deflection, I am just curious as to how three closely linked nations handled the pandemic, did they do things that different from each other at certain times, and if so what was the outcome.
I would also like to see what NHS discharge managers in all nations have to say about discharging untested people back into the community, particularly care homes. Who’s decision was it, and why were the care/nursing homes accepting them back?
(I have a particular interest in this as when our step-father was in a dementia home each time he was hospitalised my family and the discharge officer had to jump through so many hoops before the home would accept him back., and the onus was on them accepting him back not the hospital discharging him. This was pre Covid)