Kali2
Galaxy
They hold a different opinion to you that's what's 'wrong' with them.
It is not as simple as that. Freedom- whose freedom. It always has to be balanced with the effect on others.
There is on the one hand, the choice of care workers or health workers, on a personal level, not to be vaccinated
and on the other hand, the freedom of the elderly, in care homes or in need of care at home, the weak and fragile, for any reasons, including those who are immuno-supressed- of all ages, having cancer treatment or in remission, and many more- who should be able to choose if they are cared for, or treated, by those who are vaccinated and less likely to infect or re-infect them, or those who are not and ...
Why should the choice of some, put some at greater risks the others- especially the ... long list above and more. And society at large too, for whom this crisis is lasting much longer than it should due to low levels of vaccination in some areas.
I have many friends who are not vaccinated, and I choose to be tolerant of their views, and still meet up with them socially. Most of them take responsibility for their decision and do everything to avoid putting anyone at risk. Fair enough.
But if you are a carer or healthworker, doctor, nurse, etc- then it is a different situation. Their cares, patients have NO choice in who treats them, and are not even allowed to ask. And they have no choice to avoid the situation, being in contact with the above - for obvious reasons. Where is THEIR freedom?
The weight should be in favour of the weak and fragile- always.
Absolutely agree with the sentiments expressed here.
My son is currently waiting for surgery, he will have little choice in the staff around him at this time.
He's followed all of the guidance and tried his very best to remain safe...why should that be risked in a hospital when all he wants is his quality of life improved.