LilacChaser
I wonder whether Scotland would have been able to afford their stricter covid restrictions had they already been independent when the pandemic occurred?
If independent, will they be able to afford to carry on in the same manner should we get worse occurrences in the future?
Not a criticism, just a thought.
I think what has to be borne in mind is that Scotland would be a whole new country, a country of 5.4 million people which would have its own priorities. NZ had 5 million people, so does Denmark. Now each of these countries set their own rules for Covid. Other, smaller countries were equally able to set their own rules and finance them. None of these countries were sitting there saying that they wished they were still part of their historic, larger empires so that they could have more money. (Although maybe the European ones got EU help?)
So in the future, Scotland would be a proper country, financing its own decisions. That's why the comments about English subsidies and running out of oil are so inflammatory. Are we the only country in the world that can't run its own affairs? Are we the only people who are too stupid to do it? (I know some people think that we are, but best not dwell on that...)
Perhaps if we had been independent we could have closed our own borders more quickly; you know, the thing that so many people all over the UK have been calling for?