Official tonight 'Brexit is NOT done'

MaizieD

growstuff

varian

What utter nonsense!

Do you mean the imperial measurements? Yes, it's nonsense - pandering the over 66 year olds - anybody younger would have been brought up with metric.

I'm over 70 and I have absolutely no desire to return to imperial measures.

Mind you, people still use them in shops like butchers and greengrocers for quantities and most shop assistants manage to be 'bilingual' in imperial and metric weights. It's not difficult.

But utterly stupid to try to revert. They really are scraping the barrel for Brexit 'benefits, aren't they? How embarrassing the UK has become.

Exactly- but the main issue of course is not about individuals buying apples at the market, on brisket at the butcher's - but business/industrial production. Any multi-national supply chain has to use the same calibre and measurements- otherwise is just does not work. All industrial plants can't change all the calibration depending on whether the order is going to UK, or other parts of Europe.

In Ye Olde Days- you could have trains with different track widths- but as soon as travel became national and then international- it became impossible. Both metrication and Imperial have they pros and cons- but mixing the two is a disaster.

Do you remember the early days, when if you wanted to buy carpet it was advertised as price per square yard- but sold in 2, 3, or 4 metre widths, by the linear foot!!!

We are going to have enough trouble trading internationally in next few years without adding this nonsense to the mix.

GrannyRose15 and Katie59, the sake of clarity and to avoid future misuse of terminology:

‘The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), since 1922, comprises four constituent countries: England, Scotland, and Wales (which collectively make up Great Britain), as well as Northern Ireland (variously described as a country, province or region).’
This was from Wikipedia, but the same explanation is available widely. Specifically, Wales and Scotland are not regions of the UK, they are separate countries within the UK.

Casdon

GrannyRose15 and Katie59, the sake of clarity and to avoid future misuse of terminology:

‘The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), since 1922, comprises four constituent countries: England, Scotland, and Wales (which collectively make up Great Britain), as well as Northern Ireland (variously described as a country, province or region).’
This was from Wikipedia, but the same explanation is available widely. Specifically, Wales and Scotland are not regions of the UK, they are separate countries within the UK.

So now wikipedia is the final arbiter is it? I think I'd rather continue arguing

It was a simple explanation which was why I chose it GrannyRose15. I’m not sure which final arbiter you’d like, here’s another couple, just say if you want more.
www.legalbluebook.com/bluebook/v21/tables/t2-foreign-jurisdictions/t2-43-united-kingdom
thecommonwealth.org/our-member-countries/united-kingdom

GrannyRose15

Casdon

GrannyRose15 and Katie59, the sake of clarity and to avoid future misuse of terminology:

‘The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK), since 1922, comprises four constituent countries: England, Scotland, and Wales (which collectively make up Great Britain), as well as Northern Ireland (variously described as a country, province or region).’
This was from Wikipedia, but the same explanation is available widely. Specifically, Wales and Scotland are not regions of the UK, they are separate countries within the UK.

So now wikipedia is the final arbiter is it? I think I'd rather continue arguing

OK let's continue arguing: what makes England a country that doesn't apply to Scotland?

Being reported that Georgia is fast forwarding it’s application to join EU.

It will only be Russia and us left soon?

Moldavia now requested to join EU.

We are looking very isolated.

Nobody is going to get fast tracked. The EU is very rules based. I read once it’s harder to join than to leave. Turkey applied in 1999.

Reality

“Liz Truss to be 1st UK foreign minister since Brexit to attend the EU foreign affairs council.

In a sign of new reality, Britain is working closely together with EU to tackle Ukraine situation.

The previous Johnson policy of not dealing with EU bodies now discarded.”

Whitewavemark2

Reality

“Liz Truss to be 1st UK foreign minister since Brexit to attend the EU foreign affairs council.

In a sign of new reality, Britain is working closely together with EU to tackle Ukraine situation.

The previous Johnson policy of not dealing with EU bodies now discarded.”

Wouldn’t have expected anything else, we are in extraordinarily dangerous times and all Countries have to work together.

Johnson refused to join in with any EU initiatives, even when it made things worse for the UK. merely for ideological reasons. The EU was supposed to be some evil organisation which all countries were desperate to escape from and we were leading the retreat as some beacon of sovereignty. Hasn't happened. Funny that Ukraine is fighting to be a sovereign country and wants to join the EU, something we were told was impossible. Still the lies are exposed evermore.

CoolCoco

Johnson refused to join in with any EU initiatives, even when it made things worse for the UK. merely for ideological reasons. The EU was supposed to be some evil organisation which all countries were desperate to escape from and we were leading the retreat as some beacon of sovereignty. Hasn't happened. Funny that Ukraine is fighting to be a sovereign country and wants to join the EU, something we were told was impossible. Still the lies are exposed evermore.

?

Whitewavemark2

Moldavia now requested to join EU.

We are looking very isolated.

I think you might mean Moldova

1940 Romania was compelled to cede its territories between the Prut and Dniester rivers back to the Soviet Union, and the former Romanian and Ukrainian regions together became the Moldavian S.S.R. This Soviet republic became the independent nation of Moldova in 1991

Significant but very sad that US Secretary of State Blinken crosses the Atlantic not to visit UK, but to meet with EU nations in Brussels. Brexit has sidelined us. Anyone with international experience knew that, when US looks transatlantic, their view is of Europe, not Britain.

Let's not forget that we have Putin to thank for Brexit

Whitewavemark2
Blinkens visit has nothing to do with Brexit. It might come as a shock to some of you but Brexit is not on everyone’s radar at the moment, far far more important issues to discuss.

“Let's do something Putin will hate. Let's re-join the EU. And if that means we have to have cheaper food and fuel; the right to live, work, and retire in 31 other countries; higher environmental standards; and peace secured in NI, then that's a price I'm willing to pay.”

MerylStreep

Whitewavemark2
Blinkens visit has nothing to do with Brexit. It might come as a shock to some of you but Brexit is not on everyone’s radar at the moment, far far more important issues to discuss.

I don’t think you read my post correctly.

Antony Blinkin(US Secretary of State) - "What the European Union has done, over the space of a couple of weeks, is quite simply remarkable... it's not an exaggeration to say, historic.."

Just think that it would really be a punch to Putin, if UK re-joined EU. Suppose, we would then have to put up with cheaper food, better human rights, ease of movements and living in many countries, halt to problems at NI border, etc. etc. - but I, for one, am willing to make these sacrifices.

MerylStreep

Whitewavemark2
Blinkens visit has nothing to do with Brexit. It might come as a shock to some of you but Brexit is not on everyone’s radar at the moment, far far more important issues to discuss.

If Russia - Putin - interfered in the vote to Leave, putting it simplistically, then Brexit is all part and parcel of what's happening.

Beyond doubt, a de-stabilised Europe is Putin's aim and Brexit played a part in that de-stabilisation. In that respect, it's still relevant, whether it's on people's minds or not.

“How shaming to think of the Eurosceptics who pretended the EU was some kind of foreign occupier, referring to it as the ‘EUSSR’. How shaming to think that the British contribution to this noble postwar ideal was to abandon it.”

MerylStreep

Whitewavemark2
Blinkens visit has nothing to do with Brexit. It might come as a shock to some of you but Brexit is not on everyone’s radar at the moment, far far more important issues to discuss.

One of the 'more important issues' is the extensive funding of the tory party by Russian oligarchs, both in donations to the party and to individual MPs; the closeness of so many of the key 'Vote Leave' figures to Russia and the funding of Leave campaigns by Russian money, and the strange reluctance of the government to implement immediate and swingeing sanctions on Russian money in the UK. The EU and the US have acted promptly to impose sanctions on oligarchs, while the tory government has given a Russian bank 30 day's grace and sanctions on dirty money laundering won't be implemented for 18 months.

I am intrigued as to why the tory voters among us don't seem overly concerned about this. We're not hearing any concerns about Russian involvement in our government or the snails pace at which it is moving on sanctions...

So EU membership applications put in by:

• Ukraine ??
• Moldova ??
• Georgia ??

That means only:

• Russia ??
• Belarus ??
• United Kingdom ??

Want nothing to do with the EU ??

The UK and Belarus are the only two European countries to elect their government by the votes of a minority using First Past The Post.

That may not be the only thing they have in common - Russian interference in their so-called democracies being another obvious one.