Nicola ... again. Shut up woman! Are you for real?

I think it a bad idea to involve NATO. GT Britain houses American planes, but they won’t be the target we will, America goes into many countries wars but their country is safe. The fighting retaliation will be nuclear. Russia have already used that vacuum bomb that kills every living person or thing. It is us they will target. People should think if we make a move whats tge next step Putin will take, he is dangerous, mad and ruthless and determined only to win at the expense even of his own people. He’s will have a bunker somewhere.

MaizieD

Casdon

If Yammy had read the thread she would have seen that I said it first on this thread, and I said I wasn’t Scottish too.
Goady wasn’t invented by Gransnetters, it’s in the urban dictionary. It means ‘ something totally outrageous that ends up being funny, but also stupid and gross.’ Quite apt.

Strange definition.

A 'goad' (verb) was an irritating action designed to provoke a reaction. I don't see where the humour comes in...

It's very applicable to the OP...

I think it might be because I said where I come from the equivalent of goady where I come from would be is"It's holding the cats' ar..to the fire". Though of course that is stupid and gross and not at all funny,in some peoples opinions.

volver I wouldn't expect Sturgeon to comment publicly on a matter that's not devolved to Scotland. We have a UK defence minister and that's who I expect to hear from on the matter of Ukraine.
Plenty up here for Sturgeon to be getting on with!

I didn’t call you stupid and gross Yammy, I would never say that to anybody, I just said you should have read the full post before suggesting that Scottish grans were talking in code.
I did think it was funny MaizieD, because it was so transparent that Urmstongran was seeking to stir things up again. It’s not my definition though, that’s what it says in the urban dictionary.

Casdon

If Yammy had read the thread she would have seen that I said it first on this thread, and I said I wasn’t Scottish too.
Goady wasn’t invented by Gransnetters, it’s in the urban dictionary. It means ‘ something totally outrageous that ends up being funny, but also stupid and gross.’ Quite apt.

Strange definition.

A 'goad' (verb) was an irritating action designed to provoke a reaction. I don't see where the humour comes in...

It's very applicable to the OP...

Casdon

If Yammy had read the thread she would have seen that I said it first on this thread, and I said I wasn’t Scottish too.
Goady wasn’t invented by Gransnetters, it’s in the urban dictionary. It means ‘ something totally outrageous that ends up being funny, but also stupid and gross.’ Quite apt.

Yammy did read the thread right from the first and was one of the first to make a comment yesterday.
If I have not heard a term how can I be expected to know what it means?
I apologise to all Scots Gransnetters for saying they talk in code.
Though do add DH Yammy has never heard it either and we have lived and worked in many places in Britain.
If you think it is apt to call me stupid and gross I reserve my judgment of you to be kept to myself .

Sorry not sorry for so many posts I’ve been out all day (NOT having fun) and read this whole thread which I found quite sickening in its inaccuracy and sneery attitude to things Scottish, so I just posted all that as a reaction.

volver

^Standard responses to any criticism. Please choose one, or more if the discussion continues and you have really run out of valid responses.^

You're jealous.

You're a bully.

You have no sense of humour.

You're woke.

Its not a real country anyway.

Ooh it’s a pile on.

Ooh you’re not allowed to criticise NS

Ooh but look at all the Boris bashing,

Ooh I’ll just ignore when someone shows my inaccuracies

Ooh I have got better things to do in my fabulous life

If Yammy had read the thread she would have seen that I said it first on this thread, and I said I wasn’t Scottish too.
Goady wasn’t invented by Gransnetters, it’s in the urban dictionary. It means ‘ something totally outrageous that ends up being funny, but also stupid and gross.’ Quite apt.

Urmstongran

If GNHQ take this post down it will be a shame.
An opinion is not bullying or toady just because it doesn’t chime with yours Espee.

Cancel culture at its best! Let’s not have a debate ... just shut it down eh? That’s best for some.

Debate ?? ???

Urmstongran

If GNHQ take this post down it will be a shame.
An opinion is not bullying or toady just because it doesn’t chime with yours Espee.

Cancel culture at its best! Let’s not have a debate ... just shut it down eh? That’s best for some.

Still UG ignores any post but the ones which accept her OP as gospel.

Yammy

What does Goady mean? Are Scots on grans net now using code?

No. Posts that goad are often described as goady on GN. Nothing to do with Scottish grans

Really? Ask yourself what you would be saying if she hadn't said anything when asked on live TV what she thinks of the situation.

Maybe the woman should just go home and stay still.

(Elsie Inglis reference there for those who get it...)

The fact that you put government in inverted commas tells us all we need to know, I think. And the point scoring by Alister Jack is nauseating.

I suppose it's more surprising to me that she feels it's up to her to say anything. Defence is not part of the remit of the Scottish 'government'.

So how would the people who are calling her an idiot answer the question if they were in her position?

A) We should definitely do it,
B) We should consider it seriously,
C) We should consider it, but not seriously,
D) We will never do it?

Please remember when formulating your answer that they have television in Russia and many people who can understand English. Please show your working.

Elegran

But she didn't say "We MUST . . . do it" , she said it should be seriously considered " Surely no-one advocates doing or not doing anything without seriously considering the action and its consequences?

Exactly. It's the right-wing press and on here the culture politicians that are stiring this. It really is pathetic.

Not only will all options have to be "seriously considered" but they will go on being seriously consided day by day and hour by hour.

I can only go by what you post GrannyGravy. All posibilities need to be kept on the table to help Ukraine if only for the less moral reason of helping ourselves. When has appeasement worked with Putin?

But she didn't say "We MUST . . . do it" , she said it should be seriously considered " Surely no-one advocates doing or not doing anything without seriously considering the action and its consequences?

JenniferEccles

Differing opinions on here but surely everyone agrees that avoiding an all out war with Russia is to be avoided at all costs, which makes NS’s comments very stupid indeed.

It’s been widely reported that it’s not going well for Putin so shouldn’t the emphasis be on allowing him to possibly withdraw his troops without totally losing face?

I think Ukraine could make a pledge that it won’t apply to join either NATO or the EU, bearing in mind that Putin’s main fear seems to be the possible advancement eastward of the West.

Everything has to be considered to bring this terrible situation to an end but the absolute top priority must be not to give Mad Vlad any excuse to start a World War, which Sturgeon’s idiotic suggestion certainly would do.

So what will be the outcome if we "avoid all out war at all costs"? How many European countries are you prepared to see Russia take.

Fairly obviously Nicola Sturgeon is not "very stupid indeed". As a matter of interest, how have you contributed to the running of your country? In what way can we see that you are so much less "stupid" than Nicola Sturgeon? I can't think why any intelligent person would disagree with the suggestion that the West "keep its mind open to every way in which Ukraine can be helped"

This is what she said. I get the feeling few have seen it. Most seem to have picked up their "thinking" from the right-wing press as usual.
twitter.com/ITVBorderRB/status/1501542514037526529

I sincerely doubt that Ukraine will be told by others what it can do. Would England? Would Scotland? I value our democracy and realise that what happens to Ukraine and its democracy will affect us all. Some don't seem to have thought ahead at all.

DaisyAnnethe first sentence of your last paragraph is quite frankly insulting.

Both wars are/were waged on false premises.

I am not in any way supporting President Putin, just trying to get inside his head so to speak as to his justification of this invasion.

I really am desperately worried and sad for the population of Ukraine and it’s neighbours, but, and it’s a big but, initiating a NFZ will in many experts opinions accelerate towards WW111. That’s something I cannot condone in any way shape or form.

GrannyGravy13

Am I alone in seeing the parallels with PM Blair/POTUS Bush waging an illegal war in Iraq on the premise that they had were producing WMD, and President Putin alleging Ukraine is manufacturing Chemical weapons?

All we’re trying to justify their wars and the massacre of innocent citizens.

I think those allegations were proved. I was watching something the other day where the discussion referred to Iraq and wondered if, sometime in the future, the idea that it was an illegal war would be reassessed.

I think your last sentence begs the question of who/what you support. Is it Putin and dictatorship or Ukraine and democracy? We have seen already that Putin has massacred innocents. Are you suggesting the West and Ukraine are deliberately and brutally killing Russians other than in self-defence?

Urmstongran

GillT57

I think urmstongran must be getting weary of the company of all the other expat in Spain and has time on her hands. Try harder dear.

Ooh that’s a bullseye meanie. ?

Thank you. I do my best

Differing opinions on here but surely everyone agrees that avoiding an all out war with Russia is to be avoided at all costs, which makes NS’s comments very stupid indeed.

It’s been widely reported that it’s not going well for Putin so shouldn’t the emphasis be on allowing him to possibly withdraw his troops without totally losing face?

I think Ukraine could make a pledge that it won’t apply to join either NATO or the EU, bearing in mind that Putin’s main fear seems to be the possible advancement eastward of the West.

Everything has to be considered to bring this terrible situation to an end but the absolute top priority must be not to give Mad Vlad any excuse to start a World War, which Sturgeon’s idiotic suggestion certainly would do.

Daisend1

Covid according to some is over ?????????????
Not according to the news concerning RCH.

I can assure you it is not over. It is rampant around here, including in this house.

Urmstongran

Goodness when what’s been said on here is compared to what gets said about Westminster (where of course there are also plenty of caring and committed MP’s acting on behalf of their constituents too) it beggars belief! Can the SNP do no wrong? Oh wait ....

Perhaps it's worth pointing out,Urmstongran (although I doubt it) that as we are still a disUnited Kingdom, the Westminster government and Boris Johnston are still our government and our Prime Minister. We in the devolved administrations have our own governments and First Ministers as well, not instead.

I feel that I have the right to say what I like about my UK government and PM, as well as my Scottish government and FM. I would feel able to comment on the actions of Mark Drakeford, but not to be as rude about him as you feel able to be about Nicola Sturgeon. He is a leader in my country (UK) but not of my country (UK and Scotland).