Tories accuse Angela Raynor of "doing a Basic Instinct"

I can't stand Angela Raynor but this is an absolutely disgusting article which does no favours to political debate.

How did that "e" get in. Sorry!

GrannyGravy13

Mr.Johnson has tweeted

As much as I disagree with @AngelaRayner on almost every political issue I respect her as a parliamentarian and deplore the misogyny directed at her anonymously today

I have decided to treat this article as those on GN repeatedly tell us to do with anything in the Daily Mail, Mail on
Sunday or Mail online and that is ignore it.

Good decision "GrannyGravey". I echo it.

Not only should it not be ignored, it should be reported to IPSO by as many people as possible www.ipso.co.uk/

It’s despicable nonsense.

Of course, the underlying message is that Johnson is so bad ant PMQs, we need to find an excuse for it. That the best they can come up with is that he’s Benny Hill in a suit highlights how desperate his supporters are.

But I buy the DM and I'm a member of The Labour Party, so maybe it’s better just to a ignore me as an analogous misfit

Oh and look. Already, mud being slung at Rayner.

No, we shouldn't ignore it.

Wouldn’t put anything past Miss Rayner , she is the reason I won’t vote Labour along with Emily Thornberry

I think that he’s scared of her too.

But (I’m a bit scared to say this, please go easy with me) I have previously noticed that their exchanges often have a certain frisson

Zoejory

This appears to be one of the Mail's exclusives. Other papers are calling it ridiculous which it is. I didn't think that GN folk read the Mail.

Apart from anything else, they've got the wrong film. It wasn't due to Sharon Stone crossing/uncrossing her legs it was due to the lack of underwear.

I doubt even the Mail would infer that.

Totally pathetic story for clickbait.

To avoid confusion I am no fan of this government . But please. Let's not make a trashy story in a trashy paper into some massive deal.

It is a massive deal though. The DM are telling its not-insubstantial readership that a stupid, common woman of loose morals is using sex to bait our saintly, well educated PM because she can't stand up to him any other way.

So the DM readers whom are unable to tell they are being manipulated, of who there are many, now have a view of Raynor that is strengthened by misogynistic and untrue reporting.

It changes the political landscape of the country and we can't ignore it. Good for the PM for criticising them. But he did it on Twitter; which as you know is considered by many on here as the devil's work and not worth looking at. So the size of his audience is very different to that of the DM.

I doubt if Angela RayNER would have the wit to think of it.
Scared of her?
There is a large collection of clips of her greatest gaffes.

Of course Johnson isn’t a misogynist is he

How very dare she?

Carry on up The Commons!

Of course GNs read the DM Zoejory, albeit online because who would give it their money, because it's useful to know all POVs.

And whether the article can be regarded as clickbait or not, it's still indicative of the excoriation slung at Angela Raynor for being a bit too successful coming from such lowly roots.

How dare she!

Mr.Johnson has tweeted

As much as I disagree with @AngelaRayner on almost every political issue I respect her as a parliamentarian and deplore the misogyny directed at her anonymously today

I have decided to treat this article as those on GN repeatedly tell us to do with anything in the Daily Mail, Mail on
Sunday or Mail online and that is ignore it.

It is disgusting Mind it is obvious why they are choosing to attack her she is coming across as the biggest challenge to the Tories. There are numerous clips of her calling the Tories to account, both in and outside the House.
This is a great one about energy sources. twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1504073901453758464
With Dominic Raab trying to cope.

Farzanah

“Uneducated” Angela Rayner is more than a match for Eton & Oxford educated Johnson and can wipe the floor with him when she stands in for Starmer a PMQs.
I think he’s scared of her ?

Well said, I totally as agree

I don’t read the Mail but it was featured on Broadcasting House BBC4 this morning.

“Uneducated” Angela Rayner is more than a match for Eton & Oxford educated Johnson and can wipe the floor with him when she stands in for Starmer a PMQs.
I think he’s scared of her ?

This appears to be one of the Mail's exclusives. Other papers are calling it ridiculous which it is. I didn't think that GN folk read the Mail.

Apart from anything else, they've got the wrong film. It wasn't due to Sharon Stone crossing/uncrossing her legs it was due to the lack of underwear.

I doubt even the Mail would infer that.

Totally pathetic story for clickbait.

To avoid confusion I am no fan of this government . But please. Let's not make a trashy story in a trashy paper into some massive deal.

Remind me who called the Tory MPs

SCUM?

I reckon whoever said it had a point.

I just ventured over to the dark side to read the article. Could they be any more vile?

Ms Rayner, 41, a socialist grandmother who left school at 16 while pregnant and with no qualifications before becoming a care worker, has frequently landed blows on the Prime Minister during sparky – some say flirty – exchanges.

During one encounter in January, Mr Johnson raised claims that she was agitating to succeed Sir Keir by saying: ‘We all know what job she wants.’

Angela Raynor

This is as good a time as any to remind everyone

Whitewavemark2

It isn’t just the sexism though is it.

That foul article drips classism and snobbery.

They simply can’t accept that a working class woman who was schooled in the state system, could possible compete in a debate with someone who’s parents paid for their education.

That would include I suspect the vast majority reading this thread.

I agree! It's a vile article.

WTAF ???????