But which media stories do you believe? Just the ones that suit your purpose or the all of them?
I'm glad somebody has asked this because its something I've been thinking about.
When I read something in the press, or listen to a politician speaking, I try to apply a bit of critical thinking. So, for instance, if I read something in the press, I try to use what I know about the world to decide if it real or not, and how much the telling of the story has been influenced by the politics of the papers, or what they want me to believe. Same with politicians. If a politician says something which seems to either support or demolish something I believe to be true, I ask myself if that politician has a record of lying for his own ends, or if he was a respected DPP who got knighted for his work. For instance.
So I don't just "believe" anything. I exert judgement. Occasionally the Mail has an article that is true. Quite often the Guardian are harbingers of doom. If a population is educated, they should be able to judge for themselves whether a media story is reliable or not.
But too often, when the public see stories that reinforce their prejudices, they just believe them. That the poor will spend their money on booze and Sky TV for instance.
We need to be critical. Nullius in verba.