biglouis
There are working people who have been renting for years.
Its about time something was done about compelling mortgage providers to take into account the rent paid by such people in determining their income. In many cases the monthly rent comes to far more than the cost of a mortgage. People in thig group have paid their rent flawlessly and built up an excellent record. Yet they may be unable to get a mortgage because they dont have a bank of mum and dad to sub them out with a deposit.
Imagine how you cheated and angry you would feel if you were in this group and saw mortgages being given to people on benefit. You might well ask why people were being allowed to buy while supported by the taxpayer.
If you don’t have a deposit you will need at least a 100% mortgage, maybe more to cover all the costs of moving. Which means that negative equity is a very real danger for both borrower and lender. Borrowers may be happy to gamble on house prices continuing to increase, especially when they don’t have a financial stake, but you can’t expect lenders to engage in recreating the sub-prime mortgage disaster which triggered the last financial crash.
he's lost me.