Candelle
Thanks, Volver, for the informative link regarding immigration.
I can see both sides of the immigration question.
Surely we do not have the infrastructure to accept everyone person from, for example, Africa who wishes to come and live here. No matter how we would wish to help, we do not have the resources.
However, if I were a young impoverished young man from, say again, Africa and had seen the wonderful standard of living (via the internet) available in Europe, yes, I would probably chance my arm to live here.
I wonder if the fact that English is so readily available in terms of film and TV, that people have a little English and so wish to come here instead of perhaps, for example, Sweden.
I don't have any answers.
However, could someone please explain how the 'captains' of the inflatable craft are not singled out when picked up at sea by our boats? Surely someone has to have the maritime skills necessary to cross such a busy body of water such as the channel. Surely the traffickers don't just hand control of an inflatable to a rookie?
Its a complete fallacy that we do not have the infrastructure Candelle. The people who are coming across in the dinghies are all kinds of people, including professionals or people who have skills that we could use in this country. We don't have to "keep" them all, but we should be glad that tenacious people want to come here. They are only a drain on our resources because the government, specifically the Home Office, have not got an effective system for dealing with them. They are not allowed to work, their claims take forever to process, and they are basically abandoned by this country.
In 2017, the last date I can find data for, Sweden granted more asylum claims than the UK. We're really not the target for the whole world, we're really not.
None of the people on the boats, generally, have any maritime experience. They are put in the boats by people traffickers, they set off and hope for the best.