DaisyAnne
*Doodledog*, I can see no proof that shows that "one of the reasons that the 2-tier system is iniquitous is that because the rich and influential tend to use private schools they have (at best) no vested interest in improving state ones". Some do, some don't. What percentage of those sending their children to state schools show any interest in the school outside that connected to their own children?
This is othering. I expect it from the right. I did not expect it from the left. It is no different to identifying a group of people who were seen as rich but often were not, as being the reason for the downfall of a country's economy.
The issue is with the state and the issue with the state lies clearly with the voters. I will, after this thread, probably never vote Labour again. I wasn't, as some were, put off by Corbyn's extremes as the party seemed to resile from those, but I am put off by the far left on GN. Communism is when everything is owned and run by the state. This is what you are demanding for education.
I have no idea how many people use a private school but get involved in state ones. How would I know that? I can't imagine many parents feeling happy about someone having decision-making powers in their children's school when they don't use it for their own children though.
The left/right insults are tired, and show a woeful lack of understanding of what the two things mean, and a strange assumption that people's views are either one or the other. It happens a lot on here. I couldn't care less how you vote - I'm not recruiting for any party, but I can assure you that however my political allegiances could be described, I am not a communist .
This is supposedly a discussion, not a fight to the death, and it would be a lot more interesting if we could actually discuss things. Others have left this thread because of your condescending attitude, and I am going to do the same.