Oh and the message
Country first, party second
Was smart I thought.
How did you vote and why today
Bereavement wipes out everything
What colour car do you have or did you used to drive?
First.
Railways to be nationalised.
How will this be done? Gradually over a period of time - as contracts run out the rail line will be taken into public ownership.
Oh and the message
Country first, party second
Was smart I thought.
The idea is to invest in the technology providing jobs for people as varied as scientists, engineers, through all the various skills like builders, electricians, plumbers etc.
It is intended to build an industry second to none for renewables etc.
I think that they have used Norway as the model. Remembe4 how Thatcher wasted all the oil revenue whilst Norway set up a peoples fund which has grown extensively over time and is used to cushion the Norwegians from shock like the rise in energy price etc.
A peoples fund is being set up which will be replenished from the income of the renewable energy and used for future investment etc
I haven’t explained it very well as I only half listened to the speech (doing a bit of water colouring?) so perhaps someone else can almost certainly explain it better.
I think the biggest new thing apart from everything that had been headlined by the shadow front bench folk was the announcement of a publicly owned energy renewable company.
DaisyAnne
Ilovecheese
Whitewavemark2
In a speech yesterday I think it was there was the promise to build more social housing. There was recognition that not everyone wants or can afford to buy their own home.
Ah, that's good. Does anyone know if they are going to give bursarys or salaries to health trainees like nurses?
Surely (I really don't know) the Conference vote is not an instruction to the Leadership? I got the impression it just gives them an insight into what the membership is thinking, prepared to accept, etc.
That speech was given by a shadow front bencher - a woman.
I think that Starmer's speech was a bit of a recap, Ilovecheese.
Though he surely must have announced some new stuff? I didn't see it all as I had to depart on granny duty. Conference seemed to like what I saw. I thought his delivery was a bit less wooden than I have seen in the past.
Welsh students already get NHS training bursaries, I’m sure they will in England too. A number of councils here are also building new council homes.
I thought the extra places for health professionals training was in Rachel Reeves speech yesterday.
Ilovecheese
Whitewavemark2
In a speech yesterday I think it was there was the promise to build more social housing. There was recognition that not everyone wants or can afford to buy their own home.
Ah, that's good. Does anyone know if they are going to give bursarys or salaries to health trainees like nurses?
Surely (I really don't know) the Conference vote is not an instruction to the Leadership? I got the impression it just gives them an insight into what the membership is thinking, prepared to accept, etc.
LizzieDrip
^I agree with Iam voters didn’t trust Corbyn, I didn’t, nothing
to do with the press.^
How can this be true? Unless you knew Jeremy Corbyn personally, all the information we had about him was through the filter of the press - much of which has subsequently been shown to be lies and misinformation.
I don't trust the majority of the current front bench. I don't need to know them to feel like this. I have seen what they do and heard what they said.
I didn't feel like that about Jeremy Corbyn, but I did come to the conclusion that he was out of date, out of touch and not strategically clever enough to win against the type of right-winger coming out of the Tory woodwork.
varian
I try not to sound to cynical but does anyone know which party Rupert Murdoch will back at the next election?
No-one has ever become Prime Minister as a result of a UK general election without the support of Rupert Murdoch (who isn't even British) since Harold Wilson was elected in 1974.
I'm not sure that rule is immutable although I agree it's what we have seen. Richard Murdoch is 91. I suppose he has handed some things over but, no doubt, to people who share his views.
Erm.... no context though and that matters
Only two weeks after the Brighton bombing Corbyn invited
members of the IRA to Westminster, regardless of politics
people were grieving .
He attended a wreath laying ceremony for terrorists involved in the murder of the Olympic team, asked about it he said
‘I was there but I don’t think I was involved.
Ruth Smeeth left an anti semitism meeting after being verbally abused by a member of Momentum, following the
meeting Corbyn was filmed hugging the man,
Not misinformation
varian
I try not to sound to cynical but does anyone know which party Rupert Murdoch will back at the next election?
No-one has ever become Prime Minister as a result of a UK general election without the support of Rupert Murdoch (who isn't even British) since Harold Wilson was elected in 1974.
I have uncharitable thoughts on this, based on his advanced age and the likelihood of him still being around. at the next GE.. 
Of course the right wing press did all it could to trash corbyn. They’ve done it with every labour leader
That doesn’t mean the electorate was too stupid to make up its collective mind and reject him as a future prime minister
Allsorts
Is it griping to raise valid points that worry a lot of people? You can only put your head in the sand so long, Listen to people. Whatever party you follow doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything.
Sorry, Allsorts but when you say things like All he was ever interested in was scoring points of Boris, when criticising the government is the job of the opposition
And
he find tgecsamevhimself until found out. Which is incomprehensible, though I suspect you're referring to partygate.
And
not interested in the man in the street, he's never been one. When everyone knows he came from a very ordinary working family
It sounds like griping, and it sounds like a tory voter's griping, based on misinformation.
Lizziedrip people do feel that they know public figures personally, without realising the subtle filters that are applied to the reporting of interviews with those figures.
All the information we ever have about politicians is via the filter of the press. And that includes the revealing of ‘misinformation’.
One DD, a Labour voter since she had the vote and a keen active member of the Labour Party said she couldn’t vote Labour whilst Mr C was in charge, but would have to vote tactically instead. What chance did ordinary voters have?
varian Maybe he will wait to see you is likely to win first and then promise them his backing. I am not sure he is as clever and as influential as he thinks he is any more.
^I agree with Iam voters didn’t trust Corbyn, I didn’t, nothing
to do with the press.^
How can this be true? Unless you knew Jeremy Corbyn personally, all the information we had about him was through the filter of the press - much of which has subsequently been shown to be lies and misinformation.
Allsorts
Is it griping to raise valid points that worry a lot of people? You can only put your head in the sand so long, Listen to people. Whatever party you follow doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything.
There’s ample evidence that Labour has listened to people Allsorts, Starmer has acquitted himself well, and demonstrated that the party leadership has been spending their time profitably, developing well thought through policies. At last there is hope that this country can return to one we can be proud of. I don’t know what you were hoping for that isn’t happening.
I try not to sound to cynical but does anyone know which party Rupert Murdoch will back at the next election?
No-one has ever become Prime Minister as a result of a UK general election without the support of Rupert Murdoch (who isn't even British) since Harold Wilson was elected in 1974.
Allsorts
Is it griping to raise valid points that worry a lot of people? You can only put your head in the sand so long, Listen to people. Whatever party you follow doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything.
Absolutely agree with you there. You don't have to agree with every party policy and you don't have to unconditionally admire any individual politician, you can still agree with the main thrust though.
Whitewavemark2
In a speech yesterday I think it was there was the promise to build more social housing. There was recognition that not everyone wants or can afford to buy their own home.
Ah, that's good. Does anyone know if they are going to give bursarys or salaries to health trainees like nurses?
Is it griping to raise valid points that worry a lot of people? You can only put your head in the sand so long, Listen to people. Whatever party you follow doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything.
I thought it was a wonderful speech. The most inspirational one I’ve heard at party conference since James Callaghans speech which resulted in me joining the Labour Party all those years ago. My only concern being the refusal to do any sort of deal with the SNP and I don’t see how Labour can get an overall majority now they’ve pretty much lost Scotland. Much as I understand Scotlands desire for independence I do think that we can create a better country and society if we work together. I hope that more and more people are seeing the Keir Starmer that I’ve always seen and admired. He could have easily carried on with his law work and had an easier, more comfortable life but he chose this path ( imo) to make this country a better, fairer place for us and future generations. Next weeks Conservative party conference will be interesting to say the least. I really am getting too old for all this political stuff but am prepared for one last push to get Labour elected.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.