Seems Liz Truss means business - no sleaze on her watch.

So we’re now supposed to rejoice in the fact that an MP has been immediately suspended for inappropriate behaviour instead of having a PM that protects them regardless of what they do as long as they support their leadership? It just goes to show how low our expectation now are after 12 years of this government.

The one and only thing she’s said or done that I approve of.

Oh, there will be sleaze - it is what the Tories do.

This was not the right kind of sleaze. Cronyism and backhanders are the right sort.

I object to the conservatives being in power whoever their leader is.

Joseanne

Ladyripple

Well she has had at least one extra marital affair! Hardly a paragon of virtue herself.

I do object to these comments on nearly every thread. Especially on one yesterday where Truss' teenage school children were alluded to in the same sentence.
Not a paragon of virtue for sure, but not a necessary swipe to take at the slightest opportunity.

I object to Liz Truss being the Prime Minister.I have zero interest whether you object to my comment or not.

Ladyripple

Well she has had at least one extra marital affair! Hardly a paragon of virtue herself.

Do we know what he's meant to have done? A consensual affair is not in the same ballpark as some of the things that ministers have survived doing. I'm not defending Truss' actions, but if everyone who'd had an affair got sacked, there would be a pretty slimmed down workforce.

Ladyripple

Well she has had at least one extra marital affair! Hardly a paragon of virtue herself.

I do object to these comments on nearly every thread. Especially on one yesterday where Truss' teenage school children were alluded to in the same sentence.
Not a paragon of virtue for sure, but not a necessary swipe to take at the slightest opportunity.

I would think more of her if she sacked the Chancellor for gambling with my pension funds.

Well she has had at least one extra marital affair! Hardly a paragon of virtue herself.

Why did she appoint someone who was sacked only two years ago after investigation by the standards committee?

Maybe not vegansrock (I’m not keen on her as PM) but this is a step in the right direction.

I’ll think this will go down as more sleaze. We know Johnson would have tried to brush it under the carpet and she’s trying to avoid that which is a good thing. But it shouldn’t be happening - why was this person appointed ? It won’t make her batshit policies anymore popular though.

'Nanny state'. Wwmk2'

It's every person for themselves. Can't offer any help...

Good grief

Liz Truss blocks energy saving campaign ‘on ideological grounds’.’

Can this get any more ridiculous?

MaizieD

It won't save her. She is lightly browned bread with marmalade spread on it.

?

Until we know what exactly the allegation is, it’s not possible to say whether she had any choice but to act though surely?

True, but this is heartening all the same I think.

It won't save her. She is lightly browned bread with marmalade spread on it.