I disagree with that, if the plan had been presented as a properly costed budget it may well have been acceptable, not popular but that’s a different case,
It was never going to work, KAtie59. Cutting taxes for the wealthy and for companies was never going to 'grow' the economy. The 'trickle down' effect has been empirically proven not to work time and time again. Cutting company taxes doesn't encourage investment, it just leads to share buy backs and higher dividends for shareholders. Also empirically proven.
Meanwhile, the greater part of the population, in a cost of living crisis, has very little spare money to spend on new goods and services. No company is going to invest in an economy that has very little spare money in it to generate the profit that would justify the investment.
The only way that our economy will recover most rapidly is through significant state investment. You've got to put the money into the economy before any company can take it out... Nothing else makes any sense whatsoever.
I think 'the markets' would have been fine with a strong programme of state investment and the prospect of growth.