I still do not believe that he understands most people's lives. I accept my bias will make me lean in that direction. Maybe some of you, who leapt to his defence, are swayed by your own bias.
Where does your information come from? Mine comes from watching it on video where he is using a homeless centre as a PR opportunity. That will, I accept, seem reasonable to some.
He asked if the man worked in Finance, to which Steve replied, "I'm homeless". I felt Steve sounded taken aback by the question. However, we will all have an interpretation of this. They did follow this with a chat about both of them having once worked in Finance. Fairly obviously, that had different outcomes for each of them.
His ability to empathise seems to be the issue. To empathise, you have to have some ability to understand. This event was similar to Sunak having difficulty paying for petrol having filled up someone else's car. Presumably, he is used to getting his on "account". I think these stunts show him to have very little understanding when trying to use other people's lives.
The Tory client media did a speedy job of, shall we say, realigning the facts. Dan Hodges of the Mail charged in with "I'm told the place where Rishi Sunak was helping out doesn't just provide support for those who are currently homeless." ... but this man was homeless. Sunak had promoted the visit as one where he could hear specifically from the homeless.
I feel there is a gap in any possible comprehension and empathy. Maybe I have leapt to a biased conclusion. Maybe, some of you have. I shall wait to see. But Sunak in election mode, trying to glad-hand those in poverty will, I feel, not be pleasant watching.